Suppr超能文献

关于社会类别的本质主义信念。

Essentialist beliefs about social categories.

作者信息

Haslam N, Rothschild L, Ernst D

机构信息

New School for Social Research, New York, USA.

出版信息

Br J Soc Psychol. 2000 Mar;39 ( Pt 1):113-27. doi: 10.1348/014466600164363.

Abstract

This study examines beliefs about the ontological status of social categories, asking whether their members are understood to share fixed, inhering essences or natures. Forty social categories were rated on nine elements of essentialism. These elements formed two independent dimensions, representing the degrees to which categories are understood as natural kinds and as coherent entities with inhering cores ('entitativity' or reification), respectively. Reification was negatively associated with categories' evaluative status, especially among those categories understood to be natural kinds. Essentialism is not a unitary syndrome of social beliefs, and is not monolithically associated with devaluation and prejudice, but it illuminates several aspects of social categorization.

摘要

本研究考察了关于社会类别的本体论地位的信念,询问人们是否认为其成员共享固定的、内在的本质或特性。对40个社会类别在本质主义的九个要素上进行了评分。这些要素形成了两个独立的维度,分别代表类别被理解为自然种类以及具有内在核心的连贯实体(“实体性”或具体化)的程度。具体化与类别的评价地位呈负相关,尤其是在那些被理解为自然种类的类别中。本质主义并非社会信念的单一综合征,也并非与贬低和偏见完全相关,但它阐明了社会分类的几个方面。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验