• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们的方式不会改变:未来的集体延续性会增加当下的亲社会考量。

Our ways will not change: Future collective continuity increases present prosocial considerations.

作者信息

Simić Andrej, Sacchi Simona, Perugini Marco

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Department of Pedagogy-Psychology, University of Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

出版信息

Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Jan;64(1):e12847. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12847.

DOI:10.1111/bjso.12847
PMID:39737879
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11687412/
Abstract

Collective continuity, the perception of the ingroup as an enduring temporal entity, has been linked with ingroup favouritism, negative attitudes and prejudice towards the outgroups. However, previous studies focused mainly on the perceived connection between the past and present of the group. We proposed that the expectation of a strong similarity between the present and future of the national ingroup, future collective continuity (FCC), positively affects present intergroup relations construals. In line with the hypotheses, Study 1 (N = 202) showed a positive relation between FCC and prosocial outgroup beliefs (i.e., foreigner-related). Study 2 (N = 200) suggested that FCC negatively affects prejudice towards immigrants through lower levels of collective angst. Study 3 (N = 250; preregistered) provided experimental evidence that FCC decreased outgroup prejudice and anxiety and increased collective action intentions through collective angst. Furthermore, a moderated mediation model revealed that these effects held only for individuals who identified with their nation more. Our work suggests that believing that the ingroup will not significantly change in the future might make individuals more open towards outgroup members in the present.

摘要

集体延续性,即将内群体视为一个持久的时间实体的认知,已与内群体偏袒、对外群体的消极态度和偏见联系在一起。然而,以往的研究主要关注群体过去与现在之间的感知联系。我们提出,对国家内群体现在与未来高度相似性的预期,即未来集体延续性(FCC),会对当前的群体间关系建构产生积极影响。与假设一致,研究1(N = 202)表明FCC与亲社会外群体信念(即与外国人相关的信念)之间存在正相关。研究2(N = 200)表明,FCC通过较低水平的集体焦虑对移民偏见产生负面影响。研究3(N = 250;预先注册)提供了实验证据,表明FCC通过集体焦虑减少了外群体偏见和焦虑,并增加了集体行动意图。此外,一个有调节的中介模型表明,这些效应仅适用于那些对自己国家认同度更高的个体。我们的研究表明,相信内群体在未来不会发生显著变化可能会使个体在当下对外群体成员更加开放。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae4a/11687412/d07f78a1363a/BJSO-64-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae4a/11687412/559d933603e7/BJSO-64-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae4a/11687412/bfc508516d01/BJSO-64-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae4a/11687412/d07f78a1363a/BJSO-64-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae4a/11687412/559d933603e7/BJSO-64-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae4a/11687412/bfc508516d01/BJSO-64-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae4a/11687412/d07f78a1363a/BJSO-64-0-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Our ways will not change: Future collective continuity increases present prosocial considerations.我们的方式不会改变:未来的集体延续性会增加当下的亲社会考量。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Jan;64(1):e12847. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12847.
2
Superficial ingroup love? Collective narcissism predicts ingroup image defense, outgroup prejudice, and lower ingroup loyalty.表面的内群体之爱?集体自恋预测内群体形象防御、外群体偏见和内群体忠诚度降低。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2020 Oct;59(4):857-875. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12367. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
3
I (dis)like the way you (dis)like them: The role of extended contact on social distance and attitudes towards the ingroup.我(不)喜欢你(不)喜欢他们的方式:扩展接触对社会距离和内群体态度的影响。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2021 Jan;60(1):95-120. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12381. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
4
'They will not control us': Ingroup positivity and belief in intergroup conspiracies.“他们无法控制我们”:内群体偏好与群体间阴谋信念
Br J Psychol. 2016 Aug;107(3):556-76. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12158. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
5
The development of bystander intentions and social-moral reasoning about intergroup verbal aggression.旁观者意图的发展以及关于群体间言语攻击的社会道德推理
Br J Dev Psychol. 2015 Nov;33(4):419-33. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12092. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
6
Social psychological research on prejudice as collective action supporting emergent ingroup members.社会心理学对偏见作为支持新兴内群体成员的集体行动的研究。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2019 Jan;58(1):1-32. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12294. Epub 2018 Nov 17.
7
Intergroup Contact Effects via Ingroup Distancing among Majority and Minority Groups: Moderation by Social Dominance Orientation.多数群体和少数群体之间通过内群体疏远产生的群体间接触效应:社会支配取向的调节作用。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 11;11(1):e0146895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146895. eCollection 2016.
8
Ingroup vitality and intergroup attitudes in a linguistic minority.语言少数群体中的群体活力与群体间态度
Scand J Psychol. 2007 Oct;48(5):409-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00591.x.
9
Dominant group members in intergroup interaction: safety or vulnerability in numbers?群体间互动中的主导群体成员:人多是安全还是易受伤害?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Apr;29(4):498-511. doi: 10.1177/0146167202250917.
10
Taking Seriously Ingroup Self-Evaluation, Meta-Prejudice, and Prejudice in Analyzing Interreligious Relations.在分析宗教间关系时认真对待群体内自我评估、元偏见和偏见。
Span J Psychol. 2016 Jul 18;19:E46. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2016.48.

本文引用的文献

1
When Future Leads to a Moral Present: Future Self-Relatedness Predicts Moral Judgments and Behavior in Everyday Life.当未来导向道德当下:与未来自我的关联预测日常生活中的道德判断和行为。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2025 Jul;51(7):1240-1258. doi: 10.1177/01461672231211128. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
2
Mobilizing or Sedative Effects? A Narrative Review of the Association Between Intergroup Contact and Collective Action Among Advantaged and Disadvantaged Groups.动员还是镇静作用?——优势群体与弱势群体之间的群体间接触与集体行动之间的关联的叙事性综述。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2024 May;28(2):119-180. doi: 10.1177/10888683231203141. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
3
Stuck on Intergroup Attitudes: The Need to Shift Gears to Change Intergroup Behaviors.
陷入群体间态度:需要转变思路以改变群体间行为。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Jan;19(1):280-294. doi: 10.1177/17456916231185775. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
4
Perceiving a Stable Self-Concept Enables the Experience of Meaning in Life.感知稳定的自我概念能让人体验到生活的意义。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 May;50(5):780-792. doi: 10.1177/01461672221150234. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
5
Self-Continuity.自我连续性
Annu Rev Psychol. 2023 Jan 18;74:333-361. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-032420-032236. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
6
The Meaning of Temporal Balance: Does Meaning in Life Mediate the Relationship Between a Balanced Time Perspective and Mental Health?时间平衡的意义:生活意义是否在平衡的时间观与心理健康之间起中介作用?
Eur J Psychol. 2021 Feb 26;17(1):119-133. doi: 10.5964/ejop.2415. eCollection 2021 Feb.
7
Temporal Aspects of Wellbeing in Later Life: Gardening among Older African Americans in Detroit.晚年幸福的时间维度:底特律非裔美国老年人的园艺活动
Ageing Soc. 2019;2019:1-21. doi: 10.1017/s0144686x19000813. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
8
The nation in context: How intergroup relations shape the discursive construction of identity continuity and discontinuity.语境中的民族:群体间关系如何塑造身份连续性和非连续性的话语构建。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2021 Apr;60(2):490-508. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12413. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
9
Exposure to peers' pro-diversity attitudes increases inclusion and reduces the achievement gap.接触到同伴支持多样性的态度会增加包容性,减少成绩差距。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Sep;4(9):889-897. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0899-5. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
10
Imagination and social movements.想象力与社会运动。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Oct;35:31-35. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Feb 29.