Haseman J K
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Biostatistics Branch, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA.
Drug Metab Rev. 2000 May;32(2):169-86. doi: 10.1081/dmr-100100570.
The large database of carcinogenicity results generated by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) provides a unique opportunity to critically evaluate important scientific issues such as (1) the frequency of positive outcomes, (2) the interspecies correlation in carcinogenic response between rats and mice, (3) the correlation between body weight and tumor incidence, (4) estimates of the false-positive and false-negative rates, and (5) the frequency of decreasing tumor incidences. Such database evaluations enable us to better understand the value and limitations of rodent carcinogenicity studies for determining human cancer risk. However, as the NTP database becomes increasingly accessible to the general scientific community, there is also increased opportunity for misuse of the database. This article reexamines and updates previous database evaluations, presents four scientific principles that should be employed by anyone attempting to use this database, and illustrates how failure to apply these principles can lead to misleading results.
美国国家毒理学计划(NTP)生成的大型致癌性结果数据库提供了一个独特的机会,可用于严格评估重要的科学问题,例如:(1)阳性结果的频率;(2)大鼠和小鼠致癌反应的种间相关性;(3)体重与肿瘤发生率之间的相关性;(4)假阳性和假阴性率的估计;以及(5)肿瘤发生率下降的频率。此类数据库评估使我们能够更好地理解啮齿动物致癌性研究在确定人类癌症风险方面的价值和局限性。然而,随着NTP数据库越来越容易被广大科学界获取,滥用该数据库的机会也在增加。本文重新审视并更新了以前的数据库评估,提出了任何试图使用该数据库的人都应遵循的四项科学原则,并说明了不应用这些原则如何会导致误导性结果。