Poggio J L, Rowland C M, Gores G J, Nagorney D M, Donohue J H
Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Surgery. 2000 Apr;127(4):405-11. doi: 10.1067/msy.2000.104114.
The purpose of this study was to compare the risks and benefits of performing open cholecystectomy (OC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in patients with compensated cirrhosis.
Data on 50 patients who underwent cholecystectomy for the treatment of symptomatic gallstone disease between 1990 and 1997 were collected retrospectively. These patients were divided into 2 groups: Group I included 24 patients who underwent OC, and Group II included 26 patients who underwent LC. The cohorts were well-matched for age, sex, race, clinical presentation, and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class. Twelve patients in Group I had a concomitant surgical procedure in contrast to only 2 patients in Group II. No patient in this study had CTP Class C cirrhosis.
There was no operative mortality. Conversion to OC was necessary in 3 patients (12%) during LC because of uncontrollable liver bed bleeding in 2 of the patients and insufficient visualization of the anatomy in 1 of the patients. Mean surgical times were significantly longer in Group I when comparing patients from both groups without concomitant surgical procedures (mean +/- SD, 177 +/- 91.3 minutes vs 116.8 +/- 42.3 minutes, P = .037). No patient in Group II required any blood component replacement in contrast to 9 patients (38%) in Group I. Intraoperative bleeding remained significantly higher in Group I when comparing patients without concomitant surgical procedures (P = .043). No patients in Group II had a wound complication, compared with 2 patients (8%) in Group I. The 12 patients without concomitant surgical procedures in Group I had significantly longer hospital stays when compared with 24 patients without concomitant surgical procedures in Group II (mean +/- SD, 6.9 days +/- 3.3 [median 6] vs 2.4 days +/- 1.8 [median 2.0]); P = .001.
Our results demonstrate that laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed safely in patients with CTP Class A and B cirrhosis. It offers several advantages over open cholecystectomy, including lower morbidity, shorter operative time, and reduced hospital stay with less need for transfusions.
本研究的目的是比较在代偿期肝硬化患者中进行开腹胆囊切除术(OC)和腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的风险与益处。
回顾性收集了1990年至1997年间因有症状的胆结石疾病接受胆囊切除术的50例患者的数据。这些患者被分为两组:第一组包括24例行OC的患者,第二组包括26例行LC的患者。两组在年龄、性别、种族、临床表现和Child-Turcotte-Pugh(CTP)分级方面匹配良好。第一组中有12例患者同时进行了其他手术,而第二组中只有2例。本研究中没有患者为CTP C级肝硬化。
无手术死亡病例。在LC过程中,3例患者(12%)因2例患者肝床出血无法控制和1例患者解剖结构显示不清而转为OC。在比较两组无其他手术的患者时,第一组的平均手术时间明显更长(平均±标准差,177±91.3分钟对116.8±42.3分钟,P = 0.037)。第二组中没有患者需要任何血液成分替代,而第一组中有9例患者(38%)需要。在比较无其他手术的患者时,第一组的术中出血仍明显更高(P = 0.043)。第二组中没有患者出现伤口并发症,而第一组中有2例患者(8%)出现。第一组中12例无其他手术的患者与第二组中24例无其他手术的患者相比,住院时间明显更长(平均±标准差,6.9天±3.3[中位数6]对2.4天±1.8[中位数2.0]);P = 0.001。
我们的结果表明腹腔镜胆囊切除术可在CTP A级和B级肝硬化患者中安全进行。与开腹胆囊切除术相比,它具有几个优点,包括发病率更低、手术时间更短、住院时间缩短且输血需求减少。