Suppr超能文献

持续操作测试与精神分裂症:是对刺激-反应兼容性、工作记忆、反应准备状态的测试,还是以上皆非?

Continuous performance test and schizophrenia: a test of stimulus-response compatibility, working memory, response readiness, or none of the above?

作者信息

Elvevåg B, Weinberger D R, Suter J C, Goldberg T E

机构信息

Clinical Brain Disorders Branch, NIMH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 2000 May;157(5):772-80. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.5.772.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Abnormalities of attention are considered the fundamental deficits in cognitive function manifested by patients with schizophrenia. The authors administered variations of two types of cognitive tasks to patients with schizophrenia (N=20) and normal comparison subjects (N=30) to test four possible cognitive mechanisms that might account for such abnormalities.

METHOD

Variations of the Continuous Performance Test were used to test the four mechanisms. Stimulus-response mapping was explored by comparing results on a task in which subjects were to make a response if the word "nine" was preceded by the word "one" with results on a task in which the required response was made explicit by the stimulus (the word "ready" followed by the word "press"). The building up of a prepotent response tendency was tested by manipulating the probability with which the cue and imperative stimulus appeared (17% or 50%). The amount of working memory required to maintain contextual information was tested by using different delay intervals (1000 msec and 3000 msec). The extent to which problems in vigilance might be attributable to problems in the "motoric" component of response readiness was operationalized by having subjects perform a secondary motor task concurrent with the attentional task.

RESULTS

Patients with schizophrenia performed significantly worse than the normal comparison subjects on all tasks. However, none of the four manipulations of the Continuous Performance Test tasks had a differential impact on the patients' performance speed or accuracy. In contrast, there was a significant interaction of group, delay interval, and target probability in which patients made disproportionately more omission errors at short delay intervals and at low target probabilities.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings may call into question the explanatory power of certain well-known contemporary mechanistic accounts of performance on the Continuous Performance Test in patients with schizophrenia. The findings suggest that a difficulty in rapidly encoding information (i.e., constructing a representation) in certain "unengaging" situations may be at the core of deficits on tasks associated with this attentional test.

摘要

目的

注意力异常被认为是精神分裂症患者认知功能的基本缺陷。作者对20名精神分裂症患者和30名正常对照者进行了两种认知任务的变体测试,以检验可能解释此类异常的四种认知机制。

方法

使用连续操作测试的变体来检验这四种机制。通过比较以下两种任务的结果来探究刺激-反应映射:一种任务是如果单词“one”在单词“nine”之前出现,受试者要做出反应;另一种任务是刺激(单词“ready”后跟单词“press”)明确了所需反应。通过操纵线索和命令性刺激出现的概率(17%或50%)来测试优势反应倾向的形成。通过使用不同的延迟间隔(1000毫秒和3000毫秒)来测试维持情境信息所需的工作记忆量。通过让受试者在执行注意力任务的同时执行一项次要运动任务,来操作化警觉问题可能归因于反应准备“运动”成分问题的程度。

结果

在所有任务中,精神分裂症患者的表现明显比正常对照者差。然而,连续操作测试任务的四种操纵对患者的表现速度或准确性均无差异影响。相比之下,存在显著的组、延迟间隔和目标概率的交互作用,其中患者在短延迟间隔和低目标概率下出现的遗漏错误 disproportionately 更多。

结论

这些发现可能会质疑某些当代著名的关于精神分裂症患者连续操作测试表现的机制性解释的解释力。这些发现表明,在某些“不引人关注”的情况下,快速编码信息(即构建表征)的困难可能是与该注意力测试相关任务缺陷的核心。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验