Perlesz A, Kinsella G, Crowe S
School of Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2000 Jun;15(3):909-29. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200006000-00005.
To assess family psychosocial outcome following traumatic brain injury (TBI) in all family members, including relatives more peripheral to the person with the injury.
A cross-sectional design was used to gather outcome data from individuals with TBI and primary, secondary, and tertiary carers, 19.3 months posttrauma. Multivariate analyses of variance (ANOVAs) ascertained differences in levels of psychological distress and family satisfaction within families.
Seventy-nine families (65 individuals with TBI, 72 primary carers, 43 secondary carers, and 22 tertiary carers) were drawn from a sample of outpatients of three metropolitan, acute rehabilitation hospitals over a 12-month period.
In addition to using the Family Satisfaction Scale (FSS), measures of psychological distress included the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), State Anxiety Inventory (SAI), and Profile of Mood States (POMS).
Although it was noted that a significant proportion of family members were not psychologically distressed and reported good family satisfaction, people with TBI remain at greater risk of poor psychosocial outcome than do their relatives. Of other family members, primary carers-particularly wives-are at greatest risk of poor psychosocial outcome, and a number of secondary and tertiary carers also displayed high levels of psychological distress.
Male relatives (the majority of whom were secondary or tertiary carers) may report their distress in terms of anger and fatigue, rather than as depression and anxiety. Future research could develop TBI-specific measures of anger and fatigue as screening instruments to identify peripheral family members requiring assistance in adapting to TBI. Many families-despite their initial traumatic experience-eventually cope well, encouraging researchers and clinicians to focus future research efforts on those families who have made good adjustments to TBI.
评估创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后所有家庭成员(包括受伤者较为疏远的亲属)的家庭心理社会结局。
采用横断面设计,在创伤后19.3个月收集TBI患者及其一级、二级和三级照料者的结局数据。多变量方差分析(ANOVA)确定家庭中心理困扰水平和家庭满意度的差异。
在12个月期间,从三家大都市急性康复医院的门诊患者样本中选取了79个家庭(65名TBI患者、72名一级照料者、43名二级照料者和22名三级照料者)。
除使用家庭满意度量表(FSS)外,心理困扰的测量指标还包括贝克抑郁量表(BDI)、状态焦虑量表(SAI)和情绪状态剖面图(POMS)。
尽管注意到相当一部分家庭成员没有心理困扰且报告家庭满意度良好,但TBI患者比其亲属面临更差的心理社会结局风险。在其他家庭成员中,一级照料者——尤其是妻子——面临最差心理社会结局的风险最大,一些二级和三级照料者也表现出高水平的心理困扰。
男性亲属(其中大多数是二级或三级照料者)可能以愤怒和疲劳而非抑郁和焦虑来表达他们的困扰。未来的研究可以开发针对TBI的愤怒和疲劳测量方法作为筛查工具,以识别需要帮助来适应TBI的疏远家庭成员。许多家庭——尽管经历了最初的创伤性经历——最终应对得很好,这鼓励研究人员和临床医生将未来的研究重点放在那些已很好适应TBI的家庭上。