Praml G, Schierl R
Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2000 Apr;73(3):209-14. doi: 10.1007/s004200050029.
Published data obtained from outdoor stationary sampling stations cannot be applied directly to the exposure situation in vehicles. The aim of this study, therefore, was to assess the dust exposure relevant to passengers and drivers in public buses and trams.
In the years 1993 to 1996, PM10 samples were taken during 201 journeys of typically 4 h duration on 14 routes (nine bus routes, five tramways) which were representative for the overall Munich transportation system with respect to area characteristics and traffic density. The concentrations of the samples were compared with those collected at the same time at sampling stations of the Bavarian State Office for Environmental Protection (OEP). Dust exposure was continuously and synchronously recorded by means of a tyndallometric device. Traffic and passenger density, weather conditions, special events, etc. were noted by our personnel, travelling on every journey.
The average PM10 dust concentration for all rides was 155 microg/m3 (single journey max. 686 microg/m3, min. 13 microg/m3). Interior concentrations were 1.7 to 4.0 times above those collected at the static outdoor stations. We found only minor associations between dust concentrations and traffic density or time of day. During several journeys continuous recording disclosed anomalies, dependence on weather conditions and cyclic track characteristics.
Interior PM10 particulate concentrations were comparable to those found elsewhere in truck drivers' cabs and are in the region of German regulative limits established for the general population's long term outdoor exposure. Indoor concentrations were well above the values found at stationary outdoor stations. Additional continuous recording of dust concentrations proved to be helpful in unveiling anomalies and dependencies on external effectors.
从室外固定采样站获得的已发表数据不能直接应用于车辆内的暴露情况。因此,本研究的目的是评估公共汽车和电车中乘客和司机的粉尘暴露情况。
在1993年至1996年期间,在14条线路(9条公交线路、5条电车线路)上进行了201次行程的PM10样本采集,每次行程通常持续4小时,这些线路在区域特征和交通密度方面代表了慕尼黑整个交通系统。将样本浓度与巴伐利亚州环境保护局(OEP)采样站同时采集的浓度进行比较。通过浊度测量装置连续同步记录粉尘暴露情况。我们的工作人员在每次行程中记录交通和乘客密度、天气状况、特殊事件等。
所有行程的平均PM10粉尘浓度为155微克/立方米(单次行程最高686微克/立方米,最低13微克/立方米)。车内浓度比室外固定采样站采集的浓度高1.7至4.0倍。我们发现粉尘浓度与交通密度或一天中的时间之间只有轻微关联。在几次行程中,连续记录揭示了异常情况、对天气状况的依赖性和周期性轨道特征。
车内PM10颗粒物浓度与其他地方卡车司机驾驶室中的浓度相当,处于德国为一般人群长期室外暴露设定的监管限值范围内。室内浓度远高于室外固定采样站的值。额外连续记录粉尘浓度有助于揭示异常情况以及对外部影响因素的依赖性。