Suppr超能文献

一种用于椎体成形术的新型骨水泥的生物力学评估

Biomechanical evaluation of a new bone cement for use in vertebroplasty.

作者信息

Belkoff S M, Mathis J M, Erbe E M, Fenton D C

机构信息

Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, The University of Maryland at Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 May 1;25(9):1061-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200005010-00004.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Comparative ex vivobiomechanical study.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the strength and stiffness of osteoporotic vertebral bodies subjected to compression fractures and subsequently stabilized via bipedicular injection of one of two bone cements: one is a commercially available polymethylmethacrylate (Simplex P) and one is a proprietary glass-ceramic-reinforced BisGMA/BisEMA/TEGDMA matrix composite that is being developed for use in vertebroplasty (Orthocomp).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Osteoporotic compression fractures present diagnostic and therapeutic challenges for the clinician. Vertebroplasty, a new technique for treating such fractures, stabilizes vertebral bodies by injection of cement. Little is known, however, about the biomechanics of this treatment.

METHODS

Five vertebral bodies (L1-L5) from each of four fresh spines were harvested from female cadavers (age, 80 +/- 5 years), screened for bone density using DEXA (t = -3.4 to -6.4), disarticulated, and compressed in a materials testing machine to determine initial strength and stiffness. The fractures then were repaired using a transpedicular injection of either Orthocomp or Simplex P and recrushed.

RESULTS

For both cement treatments, vertebral body strength after injection of cement was significantly greater than initial strength values. Vertebral bodies augmented with Orthocomp recovered their initial stiffness; however, vertebral bodies augmented with Simplex P were significantly less stiff than they were in their initial condition.

CONCLUSIONS

Augmentation with Orthocomp results in similar or greater mechanical properties compared with Simplex P, but these biomechanical results have yet to be substantiated in clinical studies.

摘要

研究设计

体外生物力学对比研究。

目的

确定发生压缩性骨折并随后通过双椎弓根注射两种骨水泥之一进行稳定处理的骨质疏松椎体的强度和刚度。其中一种骨水泥是市售的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(Simplex P),另一种是正在开发用于椎体成形术的专利玻璃陶瓷增强双甲基丙烯酸缩水甘油酯/双甲基丙烯酸乙氧基乙酯/三乙二醇二甲基丙烯酸酯基质复合材料(Orthocomp)。

背景资料总结

骨质疏松性压缩骨折给临床医生带来了诊断和治疗方面的挑战。椎体成形术是一种治疗此类骨折的新技术,通过注入骨水泥来稳定椎体。然而,对于这种治疗方法的生物力学了解甚少。

方法

从女性尸体(年龄80±5岁)的四个新鲜脊柱中各采集五个椎体(L1-L5),使用双能X线吸收法(DEXA)筛查骨密度(t=-3.4至-6.4),分离椎体,并在材料试验机中进行压缩以确定初始强度和刚度。然后通过椎弓根注射Orthocomp或Simplex P修复骨折并再次压碎。

结果

对于两种骨水泥治疗,注射骨水泥后的椎体强度均显著高于初始强度值。用Orthocomp增强的椎体恢复了其初始刚度;然而用Simplex P增强的椎体刚度明显低于其初始状态。

结论

与Simplex P相比,使用Orthocomp增强可产生相似或更大的力学性能,但这些生物力学结果尚未在临床研究中得到证实。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验