• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奥曲肽与丁溴东莨菪碱控制恶性不可切除性肠梗阻所致胃肠道症状的比较

Comparison of octreotide and hyoscine butylbromide in controlling gastrointestinal symptoms due to malignant inoperable bowel obstruction.

作者信息

Mercadante S, Ripamonti C, Casuccio A, Zecca E, Groff L

机构信息

Pain Relief and Palliative Care, SAMOT, Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2000 May;8(3):188-91. doi: 10.1007/s005200050283.

DOI:10.1007/s005200050283
PMID:10789958
Abstract

In advanced cancer patients with inoperable bowel obstruction, the administration of antisecretive and antiemetic drugs has proved to be effective in controlling gastrointestinal symptoms caused by bowel obstruction. However, controlled studies concerning the most effective antisecretive drug are lacking. The aim of this randomized controlled study was to determine whether octreotide or hyoscine butylbromide was the more effective antisecretive drug for use in states of inoperable bowel obstruction. Eighteen patients with inoperable bowel obstruction randomly received octreotide 0.3 mg daily (n = 9) or hyoscine butylbromide (HB) 60 mg daily (n = 9) s.c. The following parameters were measured: episodes of vomiting, nausea, drowsiness, continuous and colicky pain, using a Likert scale corresponding to a numerical value: (none 0, slight 1, moderate 2, severe 3) recorded before starting the treatment (T0) and 24 h (T1), 48 h (T2) and 72 h after (T3), and the mean daily amounts of fluids administered i.v. or s.c. during the period of study. Three patients dropped out of the study because data were incomplete. Octreotide treatment induced a significantly rapid reduction in the number of daily episodes of vomiting and intensity of nausea compared with HB treatment at the different time intervals examined. No relevant changes were found in dry mouth, drowsiness and colicky pain. Lower levels of hydration were associated with nausea regardless of the treatment. At the doses used in this study, octreotide was more effective than HB in controlling gastrointestinal symptoms of bowel obstruction. Further studies are necessary to understand the role of hydration more clearly in such a clinical situation.

摘要

在患有无法手术的肠梗阻的晚期癌症患者中,使用抗分泌和抗呕吐药物已被证明对控制肠梗阻引起的胃肠道症状有效。然而,缺乏关于最有效的抗分泌药物的对照研究。这项随机对照研究的目的是确定奥曲肽或丁溴东莨菪碱在无法手术的肠梗阻状态下是否为更有效的抗分泌药物。18例无法手术的肠梗阻患者随机接受每日皮下注射0.3mg奥曲肽(n = 9)或每日皮下注射60mg丁溴东莨菪碱(HB)(n = 9)。测量以下参数:呕吐、恶心、嗜睡、持续性和绞痛性疼痛的发作情况,使用对应数值的李克特量表:(无0,轻微1,中度2,重度3)在开始治疗前(T0)以及治疗后24小时(T1)、48小时(T2)和72小时(T3)记录,以及研究期间静脉内或皮下注射的平均每日液体量。3名患者因数据不完整退出研究。在不同检查时间间隔,与HB治疗相比,奥曲肽治疗使每日呕吐发作次数和恶心强度显著快速降低。口干、嗜睡和绞痛性疼痛未发现相关变化。无论治疗如何,较低的水合水平与恶心相关。在本研究使用的剂量下,奥曲肽在控制肠梗阻的胃肠道症状方面比HB更有效。有必要进行进一步研究以更清楚地了解水合作用在这种临床情况下的作用。

相似文献

1
Comparison of octreotide and hyoscine butylbromide in controlling gastrointestinal symptoms due to malignant inoperable bowel obstruction.奥曲肽与丁溴东莨菪碱控制恶性不可切除性肠梗阻所致胃肠道症状的比较
Support Care Cancer. 2000 May;8(3):188-91. doi: 10.1007/s005200050283.
2
Randomized clinical trial comparing octreotide and scopolamine butylbromide in symptom control of patients with inoperable bowel obstruction due to advanced ovarian cancer.比较奥曲肽和丁溴东莨菪碱对晚期卵巢癌所致无法手术的肠梗阻患者症状控制效果的随机临床试验。
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb 15;13:50. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0455-3.
3
Role of octreotide, scopolamine butylbromide, and hydration in symptom control of patients with inoperable bowel obstruction and nasogastric tubes: a prospective randomized trial.奥曲肽、丁溴东莨菪碱和补液在无法手术的肠梗阻且留置鼻胃管患者症状控制中的作用:一项前瞻性随机试验。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2000 Jan;19(1):23-34. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(99)00147-5.
4
Comparison of octreotide administration vs conservative treatment in the management of inoperable bowel obstruction in patients with far advanced cancer: a randomized, double- blind, controlled clinical trial.奥曲肽给药与保守治疗对晚期癌症患者不可手术性肠梗阻的疗效比较:一项随机、双盲、对照临床试验
Anticancer Res. 2002 Mar-Apr;22(2B):1187-92.
5
Medical treatment for inoperable malignant bowel obstruction: a qualitative systematic review.不可切除性恶性肠梗阻的医学治疗:一项定性系统评价
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Feb;33(2):217-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.06.014.
6
Antisecretory agents in gastrointestinal obstruction.胃肠道梗阻中的抗分泌剂。
Clin Geriatr Med. 2000 May;16(2):327-34. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0690(05)70059-8.
7
Scopolamine butylbromide plus octreotide in unresponsive bowel obstruction.丁溴东莨菪碱联合奥曲肽治疗难治性肠梗阻
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1998 Nov;16(5):278-80.
8
Multicenter prospective study on efficacy and safety of octreotide for inoperable malignant bowel obstruction.奥曲肽治疗不可手术恶性肠梗阻的多中心前瞻性研究
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010 Aug;40(8):739-45. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyq048. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
9
Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of octreotide in malignant bowel obstruction.奥曲肽治疗恶性肠梗阻的双盲、安慰剂对照、随机试验
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 May;49(5):814-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.09.013. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
10
Medical Therapy of Malignant Bowel Obstruction With Octreotide, Dexamethasone, and Metoclopramide.奥曲肽、地塞米松和甲氧氯普胺治疗恶性肠梗阻
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2016 May;33(4):407-10. doi: 10.1177/1049909115569047. Epub 2015 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of Malignant Bowel Obstruction in Patients with Gynaecological Cancer: A Systematic Review.妇科癌症患者恶性肠梗阻的管理:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 19;13(14):4213. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144213.
2
The range and suitability of outcome measures used in the assessment of palliative treatment for inoperable malignant bowel obstruction: A systematic review.不可手术恶性肠梗阻姑息治疗评估中使用的结局测量指标的范围和适用性:系统评价。
Palliat Med. 2022 Oct;36(9):1336-1350. doi: 10.1177/02692163221122352. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
3
MASCC multidisciplinary evidence-based recommendations for the management of malignant bowel obstruction in advanced cancer.
MASCC关于晚期癌症患者恶性肠梗阻管理的多学科循证推荐意见
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Jun;30(6):4711-4728. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-06889-8. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
4
Malignant Bowel Obstruction Management Over Time: Are We Doing Anything New? A Current Narrative Review.恶性肠梗阻管理随时间的变化:我们有新作为吗?当前的叙述性综述。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar;29(3):1995-2005. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10922-1. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
5
Medical management of malignant bowel obstruction in patients with advanced cancer: 2021 MASCC guideline update.晚期癌症患者恶性肠梗阻的医学管理:2021 年 MASCC 指南更新。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Dec;29(12):8089-8096. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06438-9. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
6
The role of parenteral nutrition in patients with malignant bowel obstruction.肠外营养在恶性肠梗阻患者中的作用。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Dec;27(12):4393-4399. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04948-1. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
7
Screening tool for malignant bowel obstruction in relapsed, metastatic ovarian cancer.复发性、转移性卵巢癌恶性肠梗阻的筛查工具
ESMO Open. 2019 Mar 21;4(2):e000463. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000463. eCollection 2019.
8
Cancer-Related Pain: Prevalence, Severity and Management in a Tertiary Care Center in the Middle East.癌症相关疼痛:中东地区一家三级医疗中心的患病率、严重程度及管理
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Mar 27;19(3):769-775. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.3.769.
9
2016 Updated MASCC/ESMO consensus recommendations: Management of nausea and vomiting in advanced cancer.2016年更新的MASCC/ESMO共识建议:晚期癌症恶心和呕吐的管理
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Jan;25(1):333-340. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3371-3. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
10
Outcome prognostic factors in inoperable malignant bowel obstruction.不可切除性恶性肠梗阻的预后因素
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Nov;24(11):4577-86. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3299-7. Epub 2016 Jun 10.