Suppr超能文献

针灸治疗腰痛。

Acupuncture for low back pain.

作者信息

Tulder MW V A, Cherkin D C, Berman B, Lao L, Koes B W

机构信息

Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, Vrije Universiteit, van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1081 BT.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD001351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001351.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although low back pain is usually a self-limiting and benign disease that tends to improve spontaneously over time, a large variety of therapeutic interventions are available for the treatment of low back pain.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effects of acupuncture for the treatment of non-specific low back pain.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (1997, issue 1), Medline (1966 - 1996), Embase (1988 - 1996), Science Citation Index and reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials of all types of acupuncture treatment that involves needling for subjects with non-specific low back pain.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers blinded with respect to authors, institution and journal independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven trials were included. The methodological quality was low. Only two trials were of high quality. Three trials compared acupuncture to no treatment, which were of low methodological quality and provide conflicting evidence. There was moderate evidence from two trials that acupuncture is not more effective than trigger point injection or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). There was limited evidence from eight trials that acupuncture is not more effective than placebo or sham acupuncture for the treatment of chronic low back pain.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The evidence summarised in this systematic review does not indicate that acupuncture is effective for the treatment of back pain.

摘要

背景

尽管腰痛通常是一种自限性良性疾病,往往会随着时间的推移自发改善,但仍有多种治疗干预措施可用于治疗腰痛。

目的

本综述的目的是评估针灸治疗非特异性腰痛的效果。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane补充医学领域试验注册库、Cochrane对照试验注册库(1997年第1期)、Medline(1966 - 1996年)、Embase(1988 - 1996年)、科学引文索引以及文章的参考文献列表。

入选标准

所有类型的针灸治疗的随机试验,这些试验涉及对非特异性腰痛患者进行针刺。

数据收集与分析

两名对作者、机构和期刊不知情的评审员独立评估试验质量并提取数据。

主要结果

纳入了11项试验。方法学质量较低。只有两项试验质量较高。三项试验将针灸与不治疗进行了比较,这些试验方法学质量较低且提供了相互矛盾的证据。两项试验提供了中等证据表明针灸并不比触发点注射或经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)更有效。八项试验提供了有限的证据表明针灸在治疗慢性腰痛方面并不比安慰剂或假针灸更有效。

综述作者的结论

本系统综述总结的证据并未表明针灸对治疗背痛有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验