Tulder MW V A, Cherkin D C, Berman B, Lao L, Koes B W
Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, Vrije Universiteit, van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1081 BT.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD001351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001351.
Although low back pain is usually a self-limiting and benign disease that tends to improve spontaneously over time, a large variety of therapeutic interventions are available for the treatment of low back pain.
The objective of this review was to assess the effects of acupuncture for the treatment of non-specific low back pain.
We searched the Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (1997, issue 1), Medline (1966 - 1996), Embase (1988 - 1996), Science Citation Index and reference lists of articles.
Randomised trials of all types of acupuncture treatment that involves needling for subjects with non-specific low back pain.
Two reviewers blinded with respect to authors, institution and journal independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.
Eleven trials were included. The methodological quality was low. Only two trials were of high quality. Three trials compared acupuncture to no treatment, which were of low methodological quality and provide conflicting evidence. There was moderate evidence from two trials that acupuncture is not more effective than trigger point injection or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). There was limited evidence from eight trials that acupuncture is not more effective than placebo or sham acupuncture for the treatment of chronic low back pain.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The evidence summarised in this systematic review does not indicate that acupuncture is effective for the treatment of back pain.
尽管腰痛通常是一种自限性良性疾病,往往会随着时间的推移自发改善,但仍有多种治疗干预措施可用于治疗腰痛。
本综述的目的是评估针灸治疗非特异性腰痛的效果。
我们检索了Cochrane补充医学领域试验注册库、Cochrane对照试验注册库(1997年第1期)、Medline(1966 - 1996年)、Embase(1988 - 1996年)、科学引文索引以及文章的参考文献列表。
所有类型的针灸治疗的随机试验,这些试验涉及对非特异性腰痛患者进行针刺。
两名对作者、机构和期刊不知情的评审员独立评估试验质量并提取数据。
纳入了11项试验。方法学质量较低。只有两项试验质量较高。三项试验将针灸与不治疗进行了比较,这些试验方法学质量较低且提供了相互矛盾的证据。两项试验提供了中等证据表明针灸并不比触发点注射或经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)更有效。八项试验提供了有限的证据表明针灸在治疗慢性腰痛方面并不比安慰剂或假针灸更有效。
本系统综述总结的证据并未表明针灸对治疗背痛有效。