Suppr超能文献

司来吉兰用于治疗阿尔茨海默病。

Selegiline for Alzheimer's disease.

作者信息

Birks J, Flicker L

机构信息

Department of Geratology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK, OX2 6HE.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000442. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000442.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Alzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia in older people accounting for some 60% of cases with late-onset cognitive deterioration. It is now thought that several neurotransmitter dysfunctions are involved from an early stage in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease-associated cognitive decline. The efficacy of selegiline for symptoms of Alzheimer's disease remains controversial and is reflected by its low rate of prescription and the lack of approval by several regulatory authorities in Europe and elsewhere. Reasons for this uncertainty involve the modest overall effects observed in some trials, the lack of benefit observed in several trials, the use of cross-over designs which harbour methodological problems in a disease like dementia and the difficulty in interpreting results from trials when a variety of measurement scales are used to assess outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review is to assess whether or not selegiline improves the well-being of patients with Alzheimer's disease.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Group Register of Clinical Trials, was searched using the terms 'selegiline', 'l-deprenyl', "eldepryl" and "monamine oxidase inhibitor-B". MEDLINE, PsycLIT and EMBASE electronic databases were searched with the above terms in addition to using the group strategy (see group details) to limit the searches to randomised controlled trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All unconfounded, double-blind, randomised controlled trials in which treatment with selegiline was administered for more than a day and compared to placebo in patients with dementia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted independently by the reviewers (JSB & LF), pooled where appropriate and possible, and the weighted or standardised mean differences (95%CI) estimated. Where possible, intention-to-treat data were used but usually the meta analyses were restricted to completers' data (data on people who completed the study).

MAIN RESULTS

There are 15 included trials. All trials examined the cognitive effects of selegiline, and in addition, 12 trials examined the behavioural and mood effects. The results of 8 trials suggested some beneficial effect of selegiline in the treatment of cognitive deficits and in 3 trials in the treatment of behaviour and mood. The meta-analysis revealed benefits on memory function as evidenced by improvement in the memory tests from several cognitive tests. Pooling the data for all cognitive tests suggested significant benefits in those subjects treated with selegiline as compared to controls. There were benefits in mood and behaviour as demonstrated by measurements on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Dementia Mood Assessment Scale. The global rating scales showed no effect of selegiline. Unfortunately, the evidence using standardised global cognitive scales was extremely limited, for both the MMSE and ADAS-cog. A variety of adverse effects were recorded, but very few patients left a trial as a direct result of the intervention.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Although the evidence for a beneficial effect of selegiline on patients with Alzheimer's disease is promising there is not yet enough evidence to recommend its use routinely in practice. The individual patient data review will yield further evidence on the effects of selegiline compared to control as would additional studies evaluating the use of selegiline for the endpoints of standardised cognitive scales, clinician impression of global change, dependency and caregiver quality of life.

摘要

背景

阿尔茨海默病是老年人痴呆最常见的病因,约占迟发性认知功能减退病例的60%。目前认为,在阿尔茨海默病相关认知功能下降的发病机制早期就涉及多种神经递质功能障碍。司来吉兰对阿尔茨海默病症状的疗效仍存在争议,这体现在其低处方率以及欧洲和其他地区一些监管机构未予批准。这种不确定性的原因包括在一些试验中观察到的总体效果一般、在多项试验中未观察到益处、交叉设计的使用(在痴呆这类疾病中存在方法学问题)以及当使用多种测量量表评估结果时难以解释试验结果。

目的

本综述的目的是评估司来吉兰是否能改善阿尔茨海默病患者的生活质量。

检索策略

使用“司来吉兰”“左旋丙炔苯丙胺”“盐酸司来吉兰”和“单胺氧化酶抑制剂 - B”检索Cochrane痴呆与认知障碍临床试验组注册库。除使用上述检索词外,还使用组策略(见组详情)在MEDLINE、PsycLIT和EMBASE电子数据库中检索,以将检索限制在随机对照试验。

入选标准

所有无混淆、双盲、随机对照试验,其中司来吉兰治疗持续超过一天,并在痴呆患者中与安慰剂进行比较。

数据收集与分析

由综述作者(JSB和LF)独立提取数据,在适当且可行的情况下进行合并,并估计加权或标准化均数差(95%CI)。尽可能使用意向性分析数据,但通常荟萃分析仅限于完成者数据(完成研究的人的数据)。

主要结果

纳入15项试验。所有试验均检测了司来吉兰的认知效应,此外,12项试验检测了行为和情绪效应。8项试验的结果表明司来吉兰在治疗认知缺陷方面有一定益处,3项试验表明在治疗行为和情绪方面有益处。荟萃分析显示对记忆功能有益,这体现在多项认知测试中的记忆测试有所改善。汇总所有认知测试的数据表明,与对照组相比,接受司来吉兰治疗的受试者有显著益处。通过简明精神病评定量表和痴呆情绪评估量表的测量表明在情绪和行为方面有益处。整体评定量表显示司来吉兰无效果。遗憾的是,对于简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)和阿尔茨海默病评定量表认知部分(ADAS - cog),使用标准化整体认知量表的证据极其有限。记录了多种不良反应,但因干预直接退出试验的患者极少。

综述作者结论

尽管有证据表明司来吉兰对阿尔茨海默病患者有益,但尚无足够证据推荐在实践中常规使用。与对照组相比,个体患者数据综述将提供关于司来吉兰效果的更多证据,评估司来吉兰用于标准化认知量表终点、临床医生对整体变化的印象、依赖程度和照料者生活质量的其他研究也将提供更多证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验