James K, Carpenter A B, Cook L, Marchand R, Nakamura R M
Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, USA.
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2000 May;7(3):436-43. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.7.3.436-443.2000.
The Association of Medical Laboratory Immunologists (AMLI) have developed a panel of antinuclear and anticytoplasmic antibody consensus sera that can be useful for enzyme immunoassay (EIA), Ouchterlony, and immunofluorescence assay methods. It was developed to assist in the evaluation of newly available EIA methods for the detection of autoantibodies. The panel of sera was evaluated in several clinical laboratories and a large number of laboratories owned by manufacturers of clinical autoantibody testing kits. The majority of sera performed well for the EIAs in both the clinical laboratories and the manufacturers' laboratories, but some samples had discrepant results. A major source of discrepancy is the current inability of the EIA results to be directly compared in a quantitative way as no standardization exists. The evaluation demonstrated lower sensitivity of detection by the Ouchterlony method. The limited evaluation of the sera with immunoblotting and Western blotting did not show good agreement with other methods. Further work must be done to standardize blotting methods prior to their use in routine clinical testing. The sera are now available to vendors and clinical laboratories for use in the detection of SS-A, SS-B, Sm, U1-RNP, Scl-70, Jo-1, double-stranded DNA, and centromere antibodies. The availability of the consensus sera will help evaluate and improve the EIA methods currently being used.
医学实验室免疫学家协会(AMLI)已开发出一组抗核和抗细胞质抗体标准血清,可用于酶免疫测定(EIA)、免疫双扩散和免疫荧光测定方法。其开发目的是协助评估新出现的用于检测自身抗体的EIA方法。该血清组在多个临床实验室以及众多临床自身抗体检测试剂盒制造商所属的实验室中进行了评估。大多数血清在临床实验室和制造商实验室的EIA检测中表现良好,但有些样本结果存在差异。差异的一个主要来源是目前由于缺乏标准化,EIA结果无法以定量方式直接比较。评估表明免疫双扩散法的检测灵敏度较低。对血清进行的免疫印迹和蛋白质印迹有限评估显示与其他方法的一致性不佳。在将印迹方法用于常规临床检测之前,必须进一步开展工作使其标准化。目前已向供应商和临床实验室提供这些血清,用于检测抗SS-A、抗SS-B、抗Sm、抗U1-RNP、抗Scl-70、抗Jo-1、抗双链DNA和抗着丝粒抗体。标准血清的可用性将有助于评估和改进目前使用的EIA方法。