Bedell J R, Cohen N L, Sullivan A
Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Elmhurst Hospital Center, NY 11373, USA.
Community Ment Health J. 2000 Apr;36(2):179-94. doi: 10.1023/a:1001894311127.
Eight published literature reviews of case management were evaluated to determine areas of consensus regarding outcomes associated with full service, broker, and hybrid models. Full service was recommended for "best practice" status and the effectiveness of the broker model was seriously questioned. Research evaluating para-professional and peer assisted models of case management, a potential method for improving outcomes, was also reviewed. One promising peer-assisted model was identified and described. Although the use of paraprofessionals and peers in case management holds promise, much more research is needed before the effectiveness of this approach can be confidently determined.
对八篇已发表的关于病例管理的文献综述进行了评估,以确定在与全方位服务、经纪人模式和混合模式相关的结果方面的共识领域。全方位服务被推荐为“最佳实践”状态,而经纪人模式的有效性受到严重质疑。还对评估辅助专业人员和同伴辅助病例管理模式(一种改善结果的潜在方法)的研究进行了综述。确定并描述了一种有前景的同伴辅助模式。尽管在病例管理中使用辅助专业人员和同伴具有前景,但在能够确定这种方法的有效性之前,还需要更多的研究。