Salyers Michelle P, Tsemberis Sam
Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Community Ment Health J. 2007 Dec;43(6):619-41. doi: 10.1007/s10597-007-9088-5. Epub 2007 May 21.
We examine whether Assertive Community Treatment (ACT), a widely implemented and rigorously studied practice, can successfully incorporate a recovery-oriented approach while continuing to retain program fidelity. We briefly review the effectiveness of ACT as an evidence-based practice, with a focus on adaptations to changing populations and contexts. We explore philosophical similarities and differences between ACT and recovery and examine how fidelity standards, a widely used indicator of how ACT teams operate, support or interfere with the adoption of a recovery-oriented practice. Finally, we provide recommendations on how best to incorporate a recovery orientation into existing ACT teams.
我们研究积极社区治疗(ACT)这一广泛实施且经过严格研究的实践方法,能否在保持项目保真度的同时,成功融入以康复为导向的方法。我们简要回顾ACT作为一种循证实践的有效性,重点关注其如何适应不断变化的人群和环境。我们探讨ACT与康复之间在理念上的异同,并研究保真度标准(一种广泛用于衡量ACT团队运作方式的指标)如何支持或阻碍以康复为导向的实践的采用。最后,我们就如何最好地将康复导向融入现有的ACT团队提供建议。