Suppr超能文献

高血压患者左心室肥厚诊断的心电图标准比较:MAVI研究

Comparison of electrocardiographic criteria for diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension: the MAVI study.

作者信息

Verdecchia P, Dovellini E V, Gorini M, Gozzelino G, Lucci D, Milletich A, Maggioni A P

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Hospital R. Silvestrini, Perugia, Italy.

出版信息

Ital Heart J. 2000 Mar;1(3):207-15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Standard electrocardiography (ECG) is a specific, but poorly sensitive tool for diagnosis of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. In a large population of subjects with hypertension we tested some standard ECG criteria in their sensitivity and specificity for LV hypertrophy. LV mass at echocardiography was the reference standard.

METHODS

In the setting of the MAVI (MAssa Ventricolare sinistra nel soggetto Iperteso) study, the ECG and echocardiographic tracings of 947 hypertensive subjects were read blindly in a central office.

RESULTS

Prevalence of LV hypertrophy at ECG was 0.6, 3.0, 4.8, 7.1, 11.1, 11.9 and 18.4%, respectively, using the following criteria: Wilson, typical strain, Romhilt-Estes score > or = 5 points, Gubner-Ungerleider, Sokolow-Lyon, Cornell voltage (S(V3)+R(avL) > 2.8 mV in men or 2.0 mV in women) and Perugia score (positivity of at least one of the following: S(V3)+R(aVL) > 2.4 mV in men or > 2.0 mV in women, a typical strain pattern, or a Romhilt-Estes point score >or = 5). Prevalence of LV hypertrophy at echocardiography ranged from 27.2% (LV mass > 125 g/m2) to 49.9% (LV mass > 51.0 g/m2.7). Using the latter gold standard, sensitivity and specificity of the above ECG criteria were 0.8 and 99.6% (Wilson), 3.8 and 97.9% (strain), 5.9 and 96.4% (Romhilt-Estes), 9.7 and 95.6% (Gubner-Ungerleider), 11.2 and 91.1% (Sokolow-Lyon), 15.2 and 91.4% (Cornell), and 22.2 and 85.4% (Perugia score).

CONCLUSIONS

Sensitivity of traditional ECG criteria for LV hypertrophy in subjects with hypertension is poor. However, the combination of three highly specific criteria (Romhilt-Estes, LV strain and Cornell) in a cumulative score produces a rise in sensitivity without excessive deterioration of specificity, with a prevalence of LV hypertrophy at ECG of 18.4%. Traditional interpretation of ECG is valuable and should be reconsidered in the clinical work-up of subjects with hypertension.

摘要

背景

标准心电图(ECG)是诊断左心室(LV)肥厚的一种特异性较高但敏感性较差的工具。在大量高血压患者中,我们对一些标准ECG标准诊断LV肥厚的敏感性和特异性进行了测试。超声心动图测得的左心室质量为参考标准。

方法

在MAVI(高血压患者左心室质量)研究中,947例高血压患者的ECG和超声心动图记录在一个中心办公室进行盲法读取。

结果

使用以下标准时,ECG诊断LV肥厚的患病率分别为0.6%、3.0%、4.8%、7.1%、11.1%、11.9%和18.4%:威尔逊标准、典型应变、Romhilt-Estes评分≥5分、古布纳-昂格勒德标准、索科洛-里昂标准、康奈尔电压(男性S(V3)+R(avL)>2.8mV或女性>2.0mV)和佩鲁贾评分(以下至少一项为阳性:男性S(V3)+R(aVL)>2.4mV或女性>2.0mV、典型应变模式或Romhilt-Estes评分≥5)。超声心动图诊断LV肥厚的患病率范围为27.2%(左心室质量>125g/m2)至49.9%(左心室质量>51.0g/m2.7)。以后者作为金标准,上述ECG标准的敏感性和特异性分别为:0.8%和99.6%(威尔逊标准)、3.8%和97.9%(应变标准)、5.9%和96.4%(Romhilt-Estes标准)、9.7%和95.6%(古布纳-昂格勒德标准)、11.2%和91.1%(索科洛-里昂标准)、15.2%和91.4%(康奈尔标准)以及22.2%和85.4%(佩鲁贾评分)。

结论

高血压患者中,传统ECG标准诊断LV肥厚的敏感性较差。然而,将三个高度特异的标准(Romhilt-Estes标准、左心室应变和康奈尔标准)组合成一个累积评分,可提高敏感性且特异性不会过度降低,ECG诊断LV肥厚的患病率为18.4%。传统的ECG解读很有价值,在高血压患者的临床检查中应重新考虑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验