Skalik R
Department of Physiology, Medical University of Wroclaw, T. Chalubinskiego ST 10, 50-368, Wroclaw, Poland,
Herz. 2015 May;40(3):386-94. doi: 10.1007/s00059-015-4214-6.
Professional and amateur athletic training can cause tremendous overload of the cardiovascular system and thus become a trigger of serious and often fatal cardiac events in athletes with a previously undetected underlying cardiovascular disease. Therefore, every athlete should undergo a specialized diagnostic and qualification screening before a training program is prescribed or continued. However, it is still an unresolved issue which of the accessible diagnostic tools should be routinely applied in order to increase the safety of extreme physical training and reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death. Pre-participation athlete evaluation including a standard electrocardiogram (ECG), physical examination, and familial history of cardiovascular diseases is important, but does not always guarantee high diagnostic accuracy. Hence, the aim of this review article is to discuss the controversy over the usefulness of ECG for the detection of cardiovascular diseases in athletes as well as the views on athlete screening methods in Europe and the USA. Differential diagnostic options and screening schemes are also described in particular groups of athletes in reference to their age, cardiovascular risk factors, as well as intensity and type of sport discipline.
专业和业余的运动训练会给心血管系统带来巨大负荷,从而成为患有先前未被发现的潜在心血管疾病的运动员发生严重且往往致命的心脏事件的诱因。因此,每位运动员在开始或继续训练计划之前都应接受专门的诊断和资格筛查。然而,为了提高极限体育训练的安全性并降低心源性猝死风险,应常规应用哪些可获取的诊断工具仍是一个未解决的问题。包括标准心电图(ECG)、体格检查和心血管疾病家族史在内的赛前运动员评估很重要,但并不总能保证高诊断准确性。因此,这篇综述文章的目的是讨论心电图在检测运动员心血管疾病方面的有用性争议,以及欧洲和美国对运动员筛查方法的观点。还特别针对不同年龄、心血管危险因素以及运动项目强度和类型的特定运动员群体描述了鉴别诊断选项和筛查方案。