Suppr超能文献

韩国患者中比较康奈尔和索科洛夫-里昂心电图标准对左心室肥厚的诊断价值。

A comparison of cornell and sokolow-lyon electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy in korean patients.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean Circ J. 2012 Sep;42(9):606-13. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2012.42.9.606. Epub 2012 Sep 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Electrocardiography (ECG) is a cost-effective and useful method for diagnosing left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in a large-scale study or in clinical practice. Among ECG criteria, the Cornell product (Cor P) and Sokolow-Lyon criteria were adopted by the European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology Guidelines but have different performances among races. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of two voltage criteria in Korean patients.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Electrocardiography and echocardiographic LV mass of 332 (159 male, 173 female) consecutive patients were analyzed. Cornell voltage criteria and the Cor P were compared with Sokolow-Lyon voltage (Sok V) and the Sokolow-Lyon product (Sok P). The sensitivities and specificities were estimated using a receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve in relation to the LVH diagnosis. The sensitivities and revised cut-off values were derived at specificity levels of 90, 95, and 100%.

RESULTS

The Cornell-based criteria generally showed better performance than that of the Sok V criteria and Sok P in the area under the ROC curve analysis. The revised cut-off values for the Cornell voltage criteria (20 and 16 mm for males and females, respectively) showed an improved sensitivity (19.7 and 30.3% for males and females, respectively), with a high specificity of 95%.

CONCLUSION

The Cornell-based criteria had better performance than that of the Sokolow-Lyon criteria in both Korean men and women. However, revised cut-off values are needed to improve accuracy.

摘要

背景和目的

心电图(ECG)是一种经济有效的方法,可用于大规模研究或临床实践中诊断左心室肥厚(LVH)。在心电图标准中,Cornell 乘积(Cor P)和 Sokolow-Lyon 标准被欧洲高血压学会-欧洲心脏病学会指南采用,但在不同种族中的表现不同。本研究旨在比较两种电压标准在韩国患者中的诊断性能。

受试者和方法

分析了 332 例(男性 159 例,女性 173 例)连续患者的心电图和超声心动图 LV 质量。比较了 Cornell 电压标准和 Cor P 与 Sokolow-Lyon 电压(Sok V)和 Sokolow-Lyon 乘积(Sok P)。使用 ROC 曲线分析评估 LVH 诊断的灵敏度和特异性。根据特异性水平为 90%、95%和 100%,得出灵敏度和修订后的截断值。

结果

Cornell 标准的曲线下面积分析一般优于 Sok V 标准和 Sok P。Cornell 电压标准的修订截断值(男性和女性分别为 20 和 16mm)提高了灵敏度(男性和女性分别为 19.7%和 30.3%),特异性为 95%。

结论

在韩国男性和女性中,Cornell 标准的表现优于 Sokolow-Lyon 标准。但是,需要修订截断值以提高准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2259/3467444/abcd9556143c/kcj-42-606-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验