Lipkus I M, Rimer B K, Halabi S, Strigo T S
Cancer Prevention, Detection and Control Research Program, Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. mc.duke.edu.
Am J Prev Med. 2000 Jan;18(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00106-3.
Telephone counseling and tailored print communications have emerged as promising methods for promoting mammography screening. However, there has been little research testing, within the same randomized field trial, of the efficacy of these two methods compared to a high-quality usual care system for enhancing screening. This study addressed the question: Compared to usual care, is tailored telephone counseling more effective than tailored print materials for promoting mammography screening?
Three-year randomized field trial.
One thousand ninety-nine women aged 50 and older recruited from a health maintenance organization in North Carolina.
Women were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: (1) usual care, (2) tailored print communications, and (3) tailored telephone counseling.
Adherence to mammography screening based on self-reports obtained during 1995, 1996, and 1997.
Compared to usual care alone, telephone counseling promoted a significantly higher proportion of women having mammograms on schedule (71% vs 61%) than did tailored print (67% vs 61%) but only after the first year of intervention (during 1996). Furthermore, compared to usual care, telephone counseling was more effective than tailored print materials at promoting being on schedule with screening during 1996 and 1997 among women who were off-schedule during the previous year.
The effects of the intervention were most pronounced after the first intervention. Compared to usual care, telephone counseling seemed particularly effective at promoting change among nonadherent women, the group for whom the intervention was developed. These results suggest that telephone counseling, rather than tailored print, might be the preferred first-line intervention for getting nonadherent women on schedule for mammography screening. Many questions would have to be answered about why the tailored print intervention was not more powerful. Nevertheless, it is clear that additional interventions will be needed to maintain women's adherence to mammography. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): mammography screening, telephone counseling, tailored print communications, barriers.
电话咨询和个性化印刷宣传材料已成为促进乳腺钼靶筛查的有前景的方法。然而,在同一随机现场试验中,与高质量常规护理系统相比,这两种方法在增强筛查效果方面的功效研究较少。本研究探讨了以下问题:与常规护理相比,个性化电话咨询在促进乳腺钼靶筛查方面是否比个性化印刷材料更有效?
为期三年的随机现场试验。
从北卡罗来纳州的一家健康维护组织招募了1099名50岁及以上的女性。
将女性随机分为三组之一:(1)常规护理,(2)个性化印刷宣传材料,(3)个性化电话咨询。
根据1995年、1996年和1997年获得的自我报告来衡量乳腺钼靶筛查的依从性。
与单独的常规护理相比,电话咨询促使按计划进行乳腺钼靶检查的女性比例显著高于个性化印刷材料(71%对67%),但仅在干预的第一年(1996年)之后出现这种情况。此外,与常规护理相比,在1996年和1997年,电话咨询在促进上一年未按计划进行筛查的女性按时进行筛查方面比个性化印刷材料更有效。
干预效果在首次干预后最为明显。与常规护理相比,电话咨询在促进未依从女性(即该干预针对的群体)的行为改变方面似乎特别有效。这些结果表明,电话咨询而非个性化印刷,可能是促使未依从女性按时进行乳腺钼靶筛查的首选一线干预措施。关于为何个性化印刷干预效果不更强,还有许多问题需要解答。然而,显然需要额外的干预措施来维持女性对乳腺钼靶筛查的依从性。医学主题词(MeSH):乳腺钼靶筛查、电话咨询、个性化印刷宣传材料、障碍