Suppr超能文献

计算机定制干预措施提高了初级保健中低收入非裔美国人的结直肠癌筛查率:一项随机试验的结果。

Computer-tailored intervention increases colorectal cancer screening among low-income African Americans in primary care: Results of a randomized trial.

机构信息

Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America; Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.

Division of Population Science, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States of America; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States of America.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2021 Apr;145:106449. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106449. Epub 2021 Feb 4.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although African Americans have the highest colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality rates of any racial group, their screening rates remain low.

STUDY DESIGN/PURPOSE: This randomized controlled trial compared efficacy of two clinic-based interventions for increasing CRC screening among African American primary care patients.

METHODS

African American patients from 11 clinics who were not current with CRC screening were randomized to receive a computer-tailored intervention (n = 335) or a non-tailored brochure (n = 358) designed to promote adherence to CRC screening. Interventions were delivered in clinic immediately prior to a provider visit. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models analyzed predictors of screening test completion. Moderators and mediators were determined using multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Significant effects of the computer-tailored intervention were observed for completion of a stool blood test (SBT) and completion of any CRC screening test (SBT or colonoscopy). The colonoscopy screening rate was higher among those receiving the computer-tailored intervention group compared to the nontailored brochure but the difference was not significant. Predictors of SBT completion were: receipt of the computer-tailored intervention; being seen at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center clinic; baseline stage of adoption; and reason for visit. Mediators of intervention effects were changes in perceived SBT barriers, changes in perceived colonoscopy benefits, changes in CRC knowledge, and patient-provider discussion. Moderators of intervention effects were age, employment, and family/friend recommendation of screening.

CONCLUSION

This one-time computer-tailored intervention significantly improved CRC screening rates among low-income African American patients. This finding was largely driven by increasing SBT but the impact of the intervention on colonoscopy screening was strong. Implementation of a CRC screening quality improvement program in the VA site that included provision of stool blood test kits and follow-up likely contributed to the strong intervention effect observed at that site. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00672828.

摘要

简介

尽管非裔美国人的结直肠癌(CRC)发病率和死亡率是所有种族中最高的,但他们的筛查率仍然很低。

研究设计/目的:本随机对照试验比较了两种基于诊所的干预措施在提高非裔美国初级保健患者 CRC 筛查中的效果。

方法

从 11 家诊所招募的未进行 CRC 筛查的非裔美国患者被随机分配接受计算机定制干预(n=335)或非定制小册子(n=358),旨在促进 CRC 筛查的依从性。干预措施在就诊前立即在诊所进行。使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型分析了筛查试验完成情况的预测因素。使用多变量线性和逻辑回归分析确定了调节因素和中介因素。

结果

计算机定制干预对粪便潜血试验(SBT)和任何 CRC 筛查试验(SBT 或结肠镜检查)的完成有显著影响。与非定制小册子相比,接受计算机定制干预的患者接受结肠镜检查的比例更高,但差异无统计学意义。SBT 完成的预测因素包括:接受计算机定制干预;在退伍军人事务医疗中心诊所就诊;采用阶段的基线;以及就诊的原因。干预效果的中介因素包括 SBT 障碍感知的变化、结肠镜检查益处感知的变化、CRC 知识的变化以及医患讨论。干预效果的调节因素包括年龄、就业和家庭/朋友对筛查的推荐。

结论

一次性计算机定制干预显著提高了低收入非裔美国患者的 CRC 筛查率。这一发现主要归因于 SBT 的增加,但干预对结肠镜检查筛查的影响也很强。在退伍军人事务站点实施 CRC 筛查质量改进计划,包括提供粪便潜血检测试剂盒和随访,可能是在该站点观察到的强烈干预效果的原因。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT00672828。

相似文献

2
Promoting colorectal cancer screening discussion: a randomized controlled trial.
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Apr;44(4):325-329. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.11.032.
3
Predictors of stage of adoption for colorectal cancer screening among African American primary care patients.
Cancer Nurs. 2014 Jul-Aug;37(4):241-51. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3182a40d8d.
6
Implementation intentions and colorectal screening: a randomized trial in safety-net clinics.
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Dec;47(6):703-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
8
A randomized trial of two print interventions to increase colon cancer screening among first-degree relatives.
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 May;71(2):215-27. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.01.013. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
10
Effect of Patient-Directed Messaging on Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e224529. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.4529.

引用本文的文献

3
Overcoming geographical and socioeconomic limitations in colorectal cancer screening.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 May 15;16(5):1683-1689. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i5.1683.
5
Colorectal Cancer Knowledge and Screening Change in African Americans: Implementation Phase Results of the EPICS Cluster RCT.
AJPM Focus. 2023 Jun 13;2(4):100121. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2023.100121. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Social determinants of health and US cancer screening interventions: A systematic review.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Sep-Oct;73(5):461-479. doi: 10.3322/caac.21801. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
10
Development of a Computer-Tailored Intervention/Decision Aid To Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Health Systems.
Cureus. 2022 Mar 21;14(3):e23372. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23372. eCollection 2022 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic Review of Interventions to Increase Stool Blood Colorectal Cancer Screening in African Americans.
J Community Health. 2021 Feb;46(1):232-244. doi: 10.1007/s10900-020-00867-z.
2
A Randomized Trial to Compare a Tailored Web-Based Intervention and Tailored Phone Counseling to Usual Care for Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Dec;27(12):1433-1441. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0180. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
3
Using a Culturally Tailored Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Knowledge and Screening among Hispanics in a Rural Community.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Nov;27(11):1283-1288. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-1092. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
6
Medical Mistrust and Colorectal Cancer Screening Among African Americans.
J Community Health. 2017 Oct;42(5):1044-1061. doi: 10.1007/s10900-017-0339-2.
9
Impact of Risk Assessment and Tailored versus Nontailored Risk Information on Colorectal Cancer Testing in Primary Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Oct;24(10):1523-30. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0122. Epub 2015 Aug 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验