Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America; Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.
Division of Population Science, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States of America; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States of America.
Prev Med. 2021 Apr;145:106449. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106449. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
Although African Americans have the highest colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality rates of any racial group, their screening rates remain low.
STUDY DESIGN/PURPOSE: This randomized controlled trial compared efficacy of two clinic-based interventions for increasing CRC screening among African American primary care patients.
African American patients from 11 clinics who were not current with CRC screening were randomized to receive a computer-tailored intervention (n = 335) or a non-tailored brochure (n = 358) designed to promote adherence to CRC screening. Interventions were delivered in clinic immediately prior to a provider visit. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models analyzed predictors of screening test completion. Moderators and mediators were determined using multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses.
Significant effects of the computer-tailored intervention were observed for completion of a stool blood test (SBT) and completion of any CRC screening test (SBT or colonoscopy). The colonoscopy screening rate was higher among those receiving the computer-tailored intervention group compared to the nontailored brochure but the difference was not significant. Predictors of SBT completion were: receipt of the computer-tailored intervention; being seen at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center clinic; baseline stage of adoption; and reason for visit. Mediators of intervention effects were changes in perceived SBT barriers, changes in perceived colonoscopy benefits, changes in CRC knowledge, and patient-provider discussion. Moderators of intervention effects were age, employment, and family/friend recommendation of screening.
This one-time computer-tailored intervention significantly improved CRC screening rates among low-income African American patients. This finding was largely driven by increasing SBT but the impact of the intervention on colonoscopy screening was strong. Implementation of a CRC screening quality improvement program in the VA site that included provision of stool blood test kits and follow-up likely contributed to the strong intervention effect observed at that site. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00672828.
尽管非裔美国人的结直肠癌(CRC)发病率和死亡率是所有种族中最高的,但他们的筛查率仍然很低。
研究设计/目的:本随机对照试验比较了两种基于诊所的干预措施在提高非裔美国初级保健患者 CRC 筛查中的效果。
从 11 家诊所招募的未进行 CRC 筛查的非裔美国患者被随机分配接受计算机定制干预(n=335)或非定制小册子(n=358),旨在促进 CRC 筛查的依从性。干预措施在就诊前立即在诊所进行。使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型分析了筛查试验完成情况的预测因素。使用多变量线性和逻辑回归分析确定了调节因素和中介因素。
计算机定制干预对粪便潜血试验(SBT)和任何 CRC 筛查试验(SBT 或结肠镜检查)的完成有显著影响。与非定制小册子相比,接受计算机定制干预的患者接受结肠镜检查的比例更高,但差异无统计学意义。SBT 完成的预测因素包括:接受计算机定制干预;在退伍军人事务医疗中心诊所就诊;采用阶段的基线;以及就诊的原因。干预效果的中介因素包括 SBT 障碍感知的变化、结肠镜检查益处感知的变化、CRC 知识的变化以及医患讨论。干预效果的调节因素包括年龄、就业和家庭/朋友对筛查的推荐。
一次性计算机定制干预显著提高了低收入非裔美国患者的 CRC 筛查率。这一发现主要归因于 SBT 的增加,但干预对结肠镜检查筛查的影响也很强。在退伍军人事务站点实施 CRC 筛查质量改进计划,包括提供粪便潜血检测试剂盒和随访,可能是在该站点观察到的强烈干预效果的原因。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT00672828。