Suppr超能文献

死于肺癌或慢性阻塞性肺疾病:来自SUPPORT的见解。了解治疗结果和风险的预后及偏好研究。

Dying with lung cancer or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: insights from SUPPORT. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.

作者信息

Claessens M T, Lynn J, Zhong Z, Desbiens N A, Phillips R S, Wu A W, Harrell F E, Connors A F

机构信息

Palliative Care Program, Marshfield Clinic and St. Joseph's Hospital, Wisconsin 54449, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 May;48(S1):S146-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03124.x.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Many are calling for patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to receive hospice care, but the traditional hospice model may be insufficient.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the course of illness and patterns of care for patients with non-small cell lung cancer and severe COPD.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study of seriously ill, hospitalized adults.

SETTING

Five teaching hospitals in the United States.

PATIENTS

Patients with Stage III or IV non-small cell lung cancer (n = 939) or acute exacerbation of severe COPD (n = 1008).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients' preferences for pattern of care and for ventilator use; symptoms; life-sustaining interventions; and survival prognoses.

RESULTS

Sixty percent in each group wanted comfort-focused care; 81% with lung cancer and 78% with COPD were extremely unwilling to have mechanical ventilation indefinitely. Severe dyspnea occurred in 32% of patients with lung cancer and 56% of patients with COPD and severe pain in 28 % of patients with lung cancer and 21% of patients with COPD. Patients with COPD who died during index hospitalization were more likely than patients with lung cancer to receive mechanical ventilation (70.4% vs 19.8%), tube feeding (38.7% vs 18.5%), and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (25.2% vs 7.8%). Mechanical ventilation had greater short term effectiveness in patients with COPD, based on survival to hospital discharge (76% vs 38%). Patients with COPD maintained higher median 2-month and 6-month survival prognoses, even days before death.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitalized patients with lung cancer or COPD preferred comfort-focused care, yet dyspnea and pain were problematic in both groups. Patients with COPD were more often treated with life-sustaining interventions, and short-term effectiveness was comparatively better than in patients with lung cancer. In caring for patients with severe COPD, consideration should be given to implementing palliative treatments more aggressively, even while remaining open to provision of life-sustaining interventions.

摘要

背景

许多人呼吁晚期慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者接受临终关怀,但传统的临终关怀模式可能并不充分。

目的

比较非小细胞肺癌患者和重度COPD患者的病程及护理模式。

设计

对病情严重的住院成人进行前瞻性队列研究。

地点

美国的五家教学医院。

患者

III期或IV期非小细胞肺癌患者(n = 939)或重度COPD急性加重患者(n = 1008)。

主要观察指标

患者对护理模式和呼吸机使用的偏好;症状;维持生命的干预措施;以及生存预后。

结果

每组中60%的患者希望接受以舒适为重点的护理;81%的肺癌患者和78%的COPD患者极其不愿意长期接受机械通气。32%的肺癌患者和56%的COPD患者出现严重呼吸困难,28%的肺癌患者和21%的COPD患者出现严重疼痛。在首次住院期间死亡的COPD患者比肺癌患者更有可能接受机械通气(70.4%对19.8%)、鼻饲(38.7%对18.5%)和心肺复苏(25.2%对7.8%)。基于出院生存率,机械通气对COPD患者的短期效果更佳(76%对38%)。即使在死亡前几天,COPD患者的2个月和6个月中位生存预后仍较高。

结论

住院的肺癌或COPD患者倾向于接受以舒适为重点的护理,但两组患者的呼吸困难和疼痛都是问题。COPD患者更常接受维持生命的干预措施,且短期效果相对优于肺癌患者。在护理重度COPD患者时,应考虑更积极地实施姑息治疗,同时也应考虑提供维持生命的干预措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验