• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者、医生和支付方对为诊断确定性支付意愿的认知与误解。

Patient, physician, and payer perceptions and misperceptions of willingness to pay for diagnostic certainty.

作者信息

Hirth R A, Bloom B S, Chernew M E, Fendrick A M

机构信息

University of Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000 Winter;16(1):35-49. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300016147.

DOI:10.1017/s0266462300016147
PMID:10815352
Abstract

Little is known about the value patients, physicians, and payers place on intangible attributes of care. Differences in valuations among these groups and misperceptions of value of intangible attributes to other groups can contribute to conflicts about treatment recommendations or coverage decisions. We surveyed patients, physicians, and managed care executives to assess their willingness to pay (WTP) for diagnostic certainty for peptic ulcer disease (PUD) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). To determine if patients, physicians, and payers accurately perceive each other's valuations of diagnostic certainty, participants were also asked to estimate the WTP of each of the other types of respondents. Patients were most likely, and executives least likely, to value diagnostic certainty. For PUD, 84% of patients, 61% of physicians, and 43% of executives expressed a positive WTP. Median WTP was low for all three groups ($1-9 for patients and physicians; $0 for payers). Physicians and executives both correctly predicted patient WTP. For GERD, 87% of patients, 52% of physicians, and 29% of executives expressed a positive WTP. Executives underestimated patient WTP. For both diseases, physicians' WTP was overestimated by patients and underestimated by executives. The inconsistency in the value that patients, physicians, and managed care executives place on diagnostic certainty indicates the potential for conflict over practice guidelines or access to services. WTP surveys can provide information to aid in anticipating and addressing areas of disagreement.

摘要

关于患者、医生和支付方对医疗服务无形属性的重视程度,我们所知甚少。这些群体之间估值的差异以及对无形属性对其他群体价值的误解,可能会导致在治疗建议或保险覆盖范围决策方面产生冲突。我们对患者、医生和管理式医疗高管进行了调查,以评估他们为消化性溃疡病(PUD)和胃食管反流病(GERD)的诊断确定性支付意愿(WTP)。为了确定患者、医生和支付方是否准确感知彼此对诊断确定性的估值,参与者还被要求估计其他类型受访者的支付意愿。患者最看重诊断确定性,而高管最不看重。对于PUD,84%的患者、61%的医生和43%的高管表示有正的支付意愿。三组的支付意愿中位数都较低(患者和医生为1 - 9美元;支付方为0美元)。医生和高管都正确预测了患者的支付意愿。对于GERD,87%的患者、52%的医生和29%的高管表示有正的支付意愿。高管低估了患者的支付意愿。对于这两种疾病,患者高估了医生的支付意愿,而高管低估了医生的支付意愿。患者、医生和管理式医疗高管对诊断确定性的价值不一致,这表明在实践指南或服务获取方面可能存在冲突。支付意愿调查可以提供信息,以帮助预测和解决分歧领域。

相似文献

1
Patient, physician, and payer perceptions and misperceptions of willingness to pay for diagnostic certainty.患者、医生和支付方对为诊断确定性支付意愿的认知与误解。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000 Winter;16(1):35-49. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300016147.
2
Willingness to pay for diagnostic certainty: comparing patients, physicians, and managed care executives.为明确诊断愿意支付的费用:患者、医生及管理式医疗高管的比较
J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Mar;14(3):193-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00313.x.
3
Work loss costs due to peptic ulcer disease and gastroesophageal reflux disease in a health maintenance organization.健康维护组织中因消化性溃疡疾病和胃食管反流病导致的工作损失成本。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Mar;95(3):788-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.01861.x.
4
Physician and Patient Preferences for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Therapies.医生和患者对非瓣膜性心房颤动治疗方法的偏好。
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):451-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
5
Physicians' perceptions towards the impact of and willingness to pay for clinical computerization in Hong Kong.香港医生对临床计算机化的影响的看法以及支付意愿。
Int J Med Inform. 2004 Jun 15;73(5):403-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.03.003.
6
Physician and patient willingness to pay for electronic cardiovascular disease management.医生和患者为电子心血管疾病管理付费的意愿。
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Jul;83(7):517-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
7
Assessing the value of symptom relief for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment: willingness to pay using a discrete choice experiment.评估胃食管反流病治疗中症状缓解对患者的价值:使用离散选择实验进行意愿支付。
Value Health. 2013 Jun;16(4):588-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 May 3.
8
Cost benefit analysis of malaria rapid diagnostic test: the perspective of Nigerian community pharmacists.疟疾快速诊断检测的成本效益分析:尼日利亚社区药剂师的视角
Malar J. 2017 Jan 3;16(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1648-0.
9
Willingness to pay for a cure of low-risk melanoma patients in Germany.德国低危黑色素瘤患者对治愈的支付意愿。
PLoS One. 2018 May 24;13(5):e0197780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197780. eCollection 2018.
10
Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life-year: the individual perspective.对质量调整生命年的支付意愿:个体视角。
Value Health. 2010 Dec;13(8):1046-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00781.x. Epub 2010 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Views on the Desirability of Diagnosing Sporadic Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy with Biological Evidence.对使用生物学证据诊断散发性脑淀粉样血管病的可取性的看法。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;87(2):807-816. doi: 10.3233/JAD-220052.
2
Efficiency of potent gastric acid inhibition.强效胃酸抑制的效率
Drugs. 2005;65 Suppl 1:105-11. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565001-00014.
3
The measurement of contingent valuation for health economics.卫生经济学中条件价值评估法的测量
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(11):691-700. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422110-00001.