• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估胃食管反流病治疗中症状缓解对患者的价值:使用离散选择实验进行意愿支付。

Assessing the value of symptom relief for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment: willingness to pay using a discrete choice experiment.

机构信息

Strategic Market Leadership & Health Services Management, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

出版信息

Value Health. 2013 Jun;16(4):588-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 May 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2013.01.007
PMID:23796293
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess patients' preferences and estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) treatments.

METHOD

Patients were randomly selected from a multicenter clinical study to participate in the discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey. Relevant treatment attributes were identified through literature review, clinical expert consultation, and focus groups. The DCE included 14 choice tasks composed of six attributes, three treatment profiles, and a "none"option considering orthogonality, D-efficiency, and level balance, while keeping patient response burden reasonable. Individual-level preferences and WTP were estimated by aggregate-level conditional logit and hierarchical Bayes analyses.

RESULTS

Our sample of 361, drawn from a clinical trial, had a mean age of 57 years, were primarily women (53%), and rated their GERD symptoms as mild/moderate (31%) and moderately severe/severe (7%). Most important attributes of GERD treatment were (in order) as follows: avoiding side effects, sleeping discomfort, daytime discomfort, dietary changes, medication cost, and treatment frequency. Simulations found that patients are willing to pay an additional US $36 to reduce susceptibility to side effects from moderate to mild or to decrease the frequency of sleeping discomfort. Patients 65 years or older were willing to pay less for daytime discomfort relief, while women would pay more to avoid sleeping discomfort.

CONCLUSIONS

Key factors concerning patients with GERD and their preference for treatment features to control GERD symptoms were confirmed. A DCE estimated WTP by GERD sufferers for relief from symptoms and avoidance of side effects using relevant treatment costs. These findings may help guide clinical treatment decisions for individual patients to improve GERD symptom control.

摘要

目的

评估患者对胃食管反流病(GERD)治疗的偏好,并估算其支付意愿(WTP)。

方法

从一项多中心临床研究中随机选择患者参与离散选择实验(DCE)调查。通过文献回顾、临床专家咨询和焦点小组确定了相关的治疗属性。DCE 包括 14 个选择任务,由六个属性、三种治疗方案和一个“无”选项组成,考虑了正交性、D 效率和水平平衡,同时保持患者的响应负担合理。通过总体条件逻辑和分层贝叶斯分析估计个体水平的偏好和 WTP。

结果

我们的样本来自一项临床试验,共 361 名患者,平均年龄为 57 岁,主要为女性(53%),GERD 症状自评轻度/中度(31%)和中度/重度(7%)。GERD 治疗的最重要属性(按顺序)如下:避免副作用、睡眠不适、日间不适、饮食改变、药物费用和治疗频率。模拟发现,患者愿意额外支付 36 美元,以降低从中度到轻度的副作用易感性,或降低睡眠不适的频率。65 岁及以上的患者愿意为缓解日间不适支付更少的费用,而女性则愿意支付更多费用以避免睡眠不适。

结论

确认了与 GERD 患者相关的关键因素及其对控制 GERD 症状的治疗特征的偏好。DCE 通过相关治疗成本估算了 GERD 患者对缓解症状和避免副作用的 WTP。这些发现可能有助于指导针对个体患者的临床治疗决策,以改善 GERD 症状控制。

相似文献

1
Assessing the value of symptom relief for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment: willingness to pay using a discrete choice experiment.评估胃食管反流病治疗中症状缓解对患者的价值:使用离散选择实验进行意愿支付。
Value Health. 2013 Jun;16(4):588-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 May 3.
2
Willingness to pay for complete symptom relief of gastroesophageal reflux disease.为实现胃食管反流病症状完全缓解而支付费用的意愿。
Arch Intern Med. 2002 Jun 24;162(12):1361-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.12.1361.
3
Patient preferences for depression treatment programs and willingness to pay for treatment.患者对抑郁症治疗方案的偏好及治疗支付意愿。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2007 Jun;10(2):73-85.
4
Look--but also listen! ReQuest: an essay on a new validated scale to assess the outcome of GERD treatment.看——但也要听!《请求》:一篇关于一种新的经过验证的评估胃食管反流病(GERD)治疗结果量表的文章。
Digestion. 2007;75 Suppl 1:87-100. doi: 10.1159/000101020. Epub 2007 May 4.
5
Patients' value of asthma services in Australian pharmacies: the way ahead for asthma care.澳大利亚药房中哮喘服务对患者的价值:哮喘护理的未来之路。
J Asthma. 2012 Apr;49(3):310-6. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2012.658130. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
6
Physician and patient willingness to pay for electronic cardiovascular disease management.医生和患者为电子心血管疾病管理付费的意愿。
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Jul;83(7):517-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
7
A valuation of patients' willingness-to-pay for insulin delivery in diabetes.糖尿病患者对胰岛素给药的支付意愿评估。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jul;25(3):359-66. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309990055.
8
A Discrete Choice Experiment to Elicit Patient Willingness to Pay for Attributes of Treatment-Induced Symptom Relief in Comorbid. Insomnia.一项离散选择实验,旨在探究患者为共病性失眠中治疗引起的症状缓解属性支付意愿。
Manag Care. 2015 Apr;24(4):42-8.
9
Lower esophageal sphincter injections for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.下食管括约肌注射治疗胃食管反流病。
Thorac Surg Clin. 2005 Aug;15(3):405-15. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2005.04.001.
10
Socioeconomic differences in preferences and willingness-to-pay for insulin delivery systems in type 1 and type 2 diabetes.1型和2型糖尿病患者在胰岛素给药系统偏好及支付意愿方面的社会经济差异。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Sep;11(9):567-73. doi: 10.1089/dia.2009.0034.

引用本文的文献

1
Health-care Workers' Willingness to Pay for COVID-19 Vaccines in Eastern Ethiopia: Using Contingent Valuation Method.埃塞俄比亚东部医护人员为新冠疫苗的支付意愿:采用条件价值评估法
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 May 19;14:395-404. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S361199. eCollection 2022.
2
What attributes should be included in a discrete choice experiment related to health technologies? A systematic literature review.与健康技术相关的离散选择实验应包含哪些属性?系统文献回顾。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 18;14(7):e0219905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219905. eCollection 2019.
3
Patient trade-offs between continuity and access in primary care interprofessional teaching clinics in Canada: a cross-sectional survey using discrete choice experiment.
加拿大初级保健跨专业教学诊所中患者在连续性和可及性之间的权衡:使用离散选择实验的横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 23;9(3):e023578. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023578.
4
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.健康经济学中的离散选择实验:过去、现在和未来。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Feb;37(2):201-226. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0734-2.
5
A descriptive review on methods to prioritize outcomes in a health care context.关于在医疗保健背景下对结果进行优先级排序方法的描述性综述。
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):1873-93. doi: 10.1111/hex.12256. Epub 2014 Aug 25.