• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生和患者为电子心血管疾病管理付费的意愿。

Physician and patient willingness to pay for electronic cardiovascular disease management.

作者信息

Deal Ken, Keshavjee Karim, Troyan Sue, Kyba Robert, Holbrook Anne Marie

机构信息

DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4M4.

CEO, InfoClin Inc, 567 College St., Suite 201, Toronto, ON, Canada M6G 3W9.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2014 Jul;83(7):517-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.04.007
PMID:24862891
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is an important target for electronic decision support. We examined the potential sustainability of an electronic CVD management program using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Our objective was to estimate physician and patient willingness-to-pay (WTP) for the current and enhanced programs.

METHODS

Focus groups, expert input and literature searches decided the attributes to be evaluated for the physician and patient DCEs, which were carried out using a Web-based program. Hierarchical Bayes analysis estimated preference coefficients for each respondent and latent class analysis segmented each sample. Simulations were used to estimate WTP for each of the attributes individually and for an enhanced vascular management system.

RESULTS

144 participants (70 physicians, 74 patients) completed the DCE. Overall, access speed to updated records and monthly payments for a nurse coordinator were the main determinants of physician choices. Two distinctly different segments of physicians were identified - one very sensitive to monthly subscription fee and speed of updating the tracker with new patient data and the other very sensitive to the monthly cost of the nurse coordinator and government billing incentives. Patient choices were most significantly influenced by the yearly subscription cost. The estimated physician WTP was slightly above the estimated threshold for sustainability while the patient WTP was below.

CONCLUSION

Current willingness to pay for electronic cardiovascular disease management should encourage innovation to provide economies of scale in program development, delivery and maintenance to meet sustainability thresholds.

摘要

目的

心血管疾病(CVD)是电子决策支持的重要目标。我们使用离散选择实验(DCE)研究了电子CVD管理项目的潜在可持续性。我们的目标是估计医生和患者对当前及强化项目的支付意愿(WTP)。

方法

焦点小组、专家意见和文献检索确定了用于医生和患者DCE评估的属性,这些评估通过基于网络的程序进行。分层贝叶斯分析估计了每个受访者的偏好系数,潜在类别分析对每个样本进行了细分。模拟用于分别估计每个属性以及强化血管管理系统的WTP。

结果

144名参与者(70名医生,74名患者)完成了DCE。总体而言,获取更新记录的速度和护士协调员的月费用是医生选择的主要决定因素。识别出两类明显不同的医生群体——一类对月订阅费和用新患者数据更新追踪器的速度非常敏感,另一类对护士协调员的月费用和政府计费激励非常敏感。患者的选择受年度订阅成本影响最大。估计的医生WTP略高于可持续性估计阈值,而患者WTP低于该阈值。

结论

当前对电子心血管疾病管理的支付意愿应鼓励创新,以便在项目开发、交付和维护方面实现规模经济,从而达到可持续性阈值。

相似文献

1
Physician and patient willingness to pay for electronic cardiovascular disease management.医生和患者为电子心血管疾病管理付费的意愿。
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Jul;83(7):517-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
2
Assessing the value of symptom relief for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment: willingness to pay using a discrete choice experiment.评估胃食管反流病治疗中症状缓解对患者的价值:使用离散选择实验进行意愿支付。
Value Health. 2013 Jun;16(4):588-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 May 3.
3
Socioeconomic differences in preferences and willingness-to-pay for insulin delivery systems in type 1 and type 2 diabetes.1型和2型糖尿病患者在胰岛素给药系统偏好及支付意愿方面的社会经济差异。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Sep;11(9):567-73. doi: 10.1089/dia.2009.0034.
4
Patient preferences for depression treatment programs and willingness to pay for treatment.患者对抑郁症治疗方案的偏好及治疗支付意愿。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2007 Jun;10(2):73-85.
5
Patient preferences and willingness-to-pay for a home or clinic based program of chronic heart failure management: findings from the Which? trial.患者对家庭或诊所为基础的慢性心力衰竭管理方案的偏好和支付意愿:来自 Which?试验的结果。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058347. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
6
Measuring Preferences for a Diabetes Pay-for-Performance for Patient (P4P4P) Program using a Discrete Choice Experiment.使用离散选择实验衡量患者糖尿病绩效付费计划(P4P4P)的偏好。
Value Health. 2015 Jul;18(5):578-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.03.1793. Epub 2015 May 28.
7
Patient preferences for a polypill for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases.患者对用于预防心血管疾病的多效药丸的偏好。
Ann Pharmacother. 2015 May;49(5):528-39. doi: 10.1177/1060028015570468. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
8
Does attribute framing in discrete choice experiments influence willingness to pay? Results from a discrete choice experiment in screening for colorectal cancer.属性框架在离散选择实验中是否会影响支付意愿?结直肠癌筛查中离散选择实验的结果。
Value Health. 2009 Mar-Apr;12(2):354-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00417.x. Epub 2008 Jul 24.
9
What Do Patients Want from Otolaryngologists? A Discrete Choice Experiment.患者对耳鼻喉科医生有何期望?一项离散选择实验。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Oct;157(4):618-624. doi: 10.1177/0194599817717662. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
10
Patient preferences and willingness-to-pay for ADHD treatment with stimulants using discrete choice experiment (DCE) in Sweden, Denmark and Norway.在瑞典、丹麦和挪威,运用离散选择实验(DCE)研究患者对使用兴奋剂治疗注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的偏好及支付意愿。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2013 Oct;67(5):351-9. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2012.748825. Epub 2012 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Physician preferences for treatment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol among patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD)-A discrete choice experiment.动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)患者中医生对低密度脂蛋白胆固醇治疗的偏好——一项离散选择实验
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 8;10(16):e35990. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35990. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.
2
Consumers' Willingness to Pay for eHealth and Its Influencing Factors: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.消费者对电子健康的支付意愿及其影响因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 14;24(9):e25959. doi: 10.2196/25959.
3
Systematic review and validity assessment of methods used in discrete choice experiments of primary healthcare professionals.
基层医疗专业人员离散选择实验中所用方法的系统评价与效度评估
Health Econ Rev. 2020 Dec 9;10(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13561-020-00295-8.
4
Patient and physician preferences for multiple sclerosis treatments in Germany: A discrete-choice experiment study.德国多发性硬化症治疗中患者与医生的偏好:一项离散选择实验研究。
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2020 Mar 8;6(1):2055217320910778. doi: 10.1177/2055217320910778. eCollection 2020 Jan-Mar.
5
How to Implement Adherence-Promoting Programs in Clinical Practice? A Discrete Choice Experiment on Physicians' Preferences.如何在临床实践中实施促进依从性的项目?一项关于医生偏好的离散选择实验。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Feb 14;14:267-276. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S222725. eCollection 2020.
6
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.健康经济学中的离散选择实验:过去、现在和未来。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Feb;37(2):201-226. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0734-2.
7
Application of discrete choice experiments to enhance stakeholder engagement as a strategy for advancing implementation: a systematic review.离散选择实验在增强利益相关者参与度方面的应用:推进实施的一种策略——系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2017 Nov 23;12(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0675-8.
8
Using Latent Class Analysis to Model Preference Heterogeneity in Health: A Systematic Review.应用潜在类别分析模型研究健康偏好异质性:系统综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Feb;36(2):175-187. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0575-4.
9
Do patients and health care providers have discordant preferences about which aspects of treatments matter most? Evidence from a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.患者和医疗服务提供者在治疗的哪些方面最为重要这一问题上是否存在不一致的偏好?来自离散选择实验系统评价的证据。
BMJ Open. 2017 May 17;7(5):e014719. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014719.
10
Patients' and physicians' preferences for type 2 diabetes mellitus treatments in Spain and Portugal: a discrete choice experiment.西班牙和葡萄牙患者及医生对2型糖尿病治疗方法的偏好:一项离散选择实验
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Oct 14;9:1443-58. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S88022. eCollection 2015.