Martin L R, Friedman H S
Department of Psychology, La Sierra University, Riverside, CA 92515, USA.
J Pers. 2000 Feb;68(1):85-110. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00092.
The goals of this study were: (a) to examine whether personality scales, meaningful in contemporary terms, could be derived from archival data; and (b) to use these scales to aid our understanding of the relation of personality to mortality. NEO PI-R data and a battery of archival items, taken from Terman's Life Cycle Study, were collected on two new samples (sample 1 mean age = 11.9, n = 167; sample 2 mean age = 22.2, n = 203). Measurement invariance of the archival scales was assessed, and validity was examined using both rational analyses and associations with the Five Factor Model. It was demonstrated that interpretable scales can be derived from 50- to 70-year-old archival data. The archival adult personality data were then used to predict mortality. Conscientiousness remains the strongest personality predictor of longevity. Criteria for establishing the validity of archivally derived scales are suggested.
(a)检验从档案数据中能否得出在当代具有意义的人格量表;(b)使用这些量表来帮助我们理解人格与死亡率之间的关系。从特曼生命周期研究中收集了新的两个样本(样本1平均年龄 = 11.9,n = 167;样本2平均年龄 = 22.2,n = 203)的NEO PI-R数据和一系列档案项目。评估了档案量表的测量不变性,并通过理性分析以及与五因素模型的关联来检验效度。结果表明,可以从50至70岁的档案数据中得出可解释的量表。然后使用档案中的成人人格数据来预测死亡率。尽责性仍然是长寿最强的人格预测因素。提出了建立档案衍生量表效度的标准。