Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania.
Oregon Research Institute.
Dev Psychol. 2014 May;50(5):1390-406. doi: 10.1037/a0030874. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
The present study used a collaborative framework to integrate 2 long-term prospective studies: the Terman Life Cycle Study and the Hawaii Personality and Health Longitudinal Study. Within a 5-factor personality-trait framework, teacher assessments of child personality were rationally and empirically aligned to establish similar factor structures across samples. Comparable items related to adult self-rated health, education, and alcohol use were harmonized, and data were pooled on harmonized items. A structural model was estimated as a multigroup analysis. Harmonized child personality factors were then used to examine markers of physiological dysfunction in the Hawaii sample and mortality risk in the Terman sample. Harmonized conscientiousness predicted less physiological dysfunction in the Hawaii sample and lower mortality risk in the Terman sample. These results illustrate how collaborative, integrative work with multiple samples offers the exciting possibility that samples from different cohorts and ages can be linked together to directly test life span theories of personality and health.
本研究采用协作框架,整合了两项长期前瞻性研究:特曼生命周期研究和夏威夷人格与健康纵向研究。在五因素人格特质框架内,教师对儿童人格的评估进行了合理和实证的调整,以在样本之间建立类似的因素结构。与成人自评健康、教育和饮酒相关的可比项目进行了协调,并在协调项目上汇总数据。作为多组分析,估计了一个结构模型。然后,使用协调后的儿童人格因素来检验夏威夷样本中的生理功能障碍标志物和特曼样本中的死亡率风险。协调后的尽责性预测夏威夷样本中的生理功能障碍较少,特曼样本中的死亡率风险较低。这些结果说明了如何通过与多个样本的协作、综合工作,为来自不同队列和年龄的样本提供了令人兴奋的可能性,可以将它们联系在一起,直接测试人格和健康的寿命理论。