Willcutt E G, Hartung C M, Lahey B B, Loney J, Pelham W E
Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado at Boulder, 80309, USA.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1999 Dec;27(6):463-72. doi: 10.1023/a:1021984126774.
This study examines the clinical utility of behavior ratings made by nonclinician examiners during assessments of preschool children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (AD/HD). Matched samples of children with (n = 127) and without (n = 125) AD/HD were utilized to test the internal, convergent, concurrent, and incremental validity of ratings completed by examiners on the Hillside Behavior Rating Scale (HBRS). Results indicated that HBRS ratings were internally consistent, possessed sufficient interrater reliability, and were significantly associated with parent and teacher reports of AD/HD when controlling for age, gender, intelligence, and symptoms of other psychopathology. HBRS ratings also were significantly associated with other measures of functioning, and provided a significant increment in the prediction of impairment over parent and teacher report alone. These findings suggest that behavioral ratings during testing provide a unique source of clinical information that may be useful as a supplement to parent and teacher reports.
本研究考察了非临床检查者在评估患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍(AD/HD)的学龄前儿童时所做行为评定的临床效用。采用了患有AD/HD(n = 127)和未患有AD/HD(n = 125)的匹配儿童样本,以检验检查者在希尔斯ide行为评定量表(HBRS)上完成的评定的内部效度、聚合效度、同时效度和增量效度。结果表明,HBRS评定具有内部一致性,具有足够的评分者间信度,并且在控制年龄、性别、智力和其他精神病理学症状时,与AD/HD的家长和教师报告显著相关。HBRS评定还与其他功能指标显著相关,并且在单独的家长和教师报告之外,在预测损害方面提供了显著的增量。这些发现表明,测试期间的行为评定提供了一个独特的临床信息来源,可作为家长和教师报告的补充。