Ljungqvist B, Reinmüller B
KTH, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2000 Mar-Apr;54(2):112-6.
This paper presents results from a comparative study of different impaction air samplers under simulated operational conditions in a controlled environment. Furthermore measurements have been performed in a body-box during evaluation of clean-room clothing and in a day care center. Microbial monitoring of controlled environments can be performed in several ways, and with the aid of different sampling instruments. Knowing the limitations of the chosen system is of vital importance for the correct evaluation and interpretation of the results. The number of Colony Forming Units (CFU) detected by one method cannot be directly compared with results from another method. The obtained results seem to indicate that in a controlled environment the exposure situation with a human contamination source gives an approximate relationship between the total number of airborne particles and the number of aerobic airborne viable particles detectable with standard methods.
本文展示了在可控环境中的模拟操作条件下,对不同撞击式空气采样器进行比较研究的结果。此外,还在评估洁净室工作服期间的人体模型舱以及日托中心进行了测量。对可控环境进行微生物监测可以通过多种方式并借助不同的采样仪器来完成。了解所选系统的局限性对于正确评估和解释结果至关重要。一种方法检测到的菌落形成单位(CFU)数量不能直接与另一种方法的结果进行比较。所获得的结果似乎表明,在可控环境中,存在人为污染源的暴露情况使得空气中总颗粒数与用标准方法可检测到的需氧空气传播活菌颗粒数之间呈现出近似关系。