Völk M, Strotzer M, Lenhart M, Manke C, Nitz W R, Seitz J, Feuerbach S, Link J
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital of Regensburg, Germany.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Jun;174(6):1583-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.174.6.1741583.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability of time-resolved three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the detection of renal artery stenosis in comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography as the standard of reference.
Forty consecutive patients (age range, 25-81 years; mean, 62.9 +/- 11.9 years) with suspected renal artery stenosis underwent intraarterial digital subtraction angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, performed on a 1.5-T system with fast low-angle shot three-dimensional imaging (3.8/1.49 [TR/TE], 25 degrees flip angle, 10-sec acquisition time, and 1.5-mm partition thickness). Three time-resolved phases were obtained in a single breath-hold. Digital subtraction angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography were evaluated by four observers who studied 80 main renal arteries and 19 accessory vessels to evaluate the degree of stenosis. A stenosis reducing the intraarterial diameter by more than 50% was regarded as hemodynamically significant. Interobserver variability was calculated.
Only one gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography study was not of diagnostic quality, as a result of failure of the power injector. All main branches were of diagnostic quality in 38 (97.4%) of the remaining 39 gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography studies. Seventeen (89.5%) of 19 accessory renal arteries were depicted with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. The overall sensitivity for significant stenoses was 92.9%. The overall specificity was 83.4%, and the overall accuracy was 85.9%. Interobserver variability of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography exceeded that of digital subtraction angiography.
Time-resolved three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is a useful noninvasive method of screening suspected renal artery stenosis because of its easy application, short examination time, and high sensitivity despite of its higher interobserver variability.
本研究旨在评估时间分辨三维钆增强磁共振血管造影术在检测肾动脉狭窄方面的诊断准确性和观察者间的变异性,并与作为参考标准的动脉内数字减影血管造影术进行比较。
连续40例(年龄范围25 - 81岁,平均62.9±11.9岁)疑似肾动脉狭窄患者接受了动脉内数字减影血管造影术和钆增强磁共振血管造影术,在1.5-T系统上采用快速低角度激发三维成像(3.8/1.49 [TR/TE],25°翻转角,10秒采集时间,1.5毫米层厚)。在一次屏气中获取三个时间分辨期相。由四位观察者对数字减影血管造影术和钆增强磁共振血管造影术进行评估,他们研究了80条主要肾动脉和19条副肾动脉以评估狭窄程度。将使动脉内径减少超过50%的狭窄视为具有血流动力学意义,并计算观察者间的变异性。
由于高压注射器故障,只有一项钆增强磁共振血管造影研究不符合诊断质量要求。在其余39项钆增强磁共振血管造影研究中,38项(97.4%)的所有主要分支均符合诊断质量要求。19条副肾动脉中有17条(89.5%)通过钆增强磁共振血管造影术得以显示。对显著狭窄的总体敏感性为92.9%。总体特异性为83.4%,总体准确性为85.9%。钆增强磁共振血管造影术的观察者间变异性超过了数字减影血管造影术。
时间分辨三维钆增强磁共振血管造影术是一种有用的无创性筛查疑似肾动脉狭窄的方法,因其应用简便、检查时间短且敏感性高,尽管观察者间变异性较高。