Aguilar B, Sroufe L A, Egeland B, Carlson E
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Dev Psychopathol. 2000 Spring;12(2):109-32. doi: 10.1017/s0954579400002017.
Moffitt's theory regarding two types of adolescent antisocial behavior was investigated using a prospective, longitudinal study of normal and abnormal development in a primarily low socioeconomic status, ethnically diverse sample. Results supported the presence of an early-onset/persistent (EOP) group and an adolescence-onset (AO) group. Groups were most reliably and significantly distinguished by indices of socioemotional history within the first 3 years, but no significant differences were found on early measures of temperament or neuropsychological functioning. EOPs scored significantly lower than other groups on measures of neuropsychological functioning only during late childhood and adolescence, suggesting that the declines in verbal functioning that have been so reliably found in this and other samples of early-starting antisocial adolescents are progressive and consequent to adverse experience. In adolescence, AOs were significantly more likely to report high levels of internalizing symptoms and life stress, suggesting that AO antisocial behavior is not a benign phenomenon. Implications of these findings for etiologic theories of adolescent antisocial behavior are discussed.
莫菲特关于青少年两种反社会行为类型的理论,是通过对一个主要为低社会经济地位、种族多样的样本进行正常与异常发育的前瞻性纵向研究来进行调查的。结果支持了早发型/持续性(EOP)组和青春期起病(AO)组的存在。在前3年内,两组最可靠且显著的区分指标是社会情感史指标,但在气质或神经心理功能的早期测量上未发现显著差异。仅在儿童晚期和青少年期,EOP组在神经心理功能测量上的得分显著低于其他组,这表明在这个以及其他早期开始反社会行为的青少年样本中一直可靠发现的语言功能下降是渐进的,且是不良经历的结果。在青少年期,AO组更有可能报告高水平的内化症状和生活压力,这表明AO反社会行为并非良性现象。本文讨论了这些发现对青少年反社会行为病因理论的意义。