Carlisi Christina O, Moffitt Terrie E, Knodt Annchen R, Harrington Honalee, Ireland David, Melzer Tracy R, Poulton Richie, Ramrakha Sandhya, Caspi Avshalom, Hariri Ahmad R, Viding Essi
Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Laboratory of NeuroGenetics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Social, Genetic, and Developmental Psychiatry Research Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;7(3):245-253. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30002-X. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
Studies with behavioural and neuropsychological tests have supported the developmental taxonomy theory of antisocial behaviour, which specifies abnormal brain development as a fundamental aspect of life-course-persistent antisocial behaviour, but no study has characterised features of brain structure associated with life-course-persistent versus adolescence-limited trajectories, as defined by prospective data. We aimed to determine whether life-course-persistent antisocial behaviour is associated with neurocognitive abnormalities by testing the hypothesis that it is also associated with brain structure abnormalities.
We used structural MRI data collected at 45 years of age from participants in the Dunedin Study, a population-representative longitudinal birth cohort of 1037 individuals born between April 1, 1972, and March 31, 1973, in Dunedin, New Zealand, who were resident in the province and who participated in the first assessment at 3 years of age. Participants underwent MRI, and mean global cortical surface area and cortical thickness were extracted for each participant. Participants had been previously subtyped as exhibiting life-course-persistent, adolescence-limited, or no history of persistent antisocial behaviour (ie, a low trajectory group) based on informant-reported and self-reported conduct problems from the ages of 7 years to 26 years. Study personnel who processed the MRI images were masked to antisocial group membership. We used linear estimated ordinary least squares regressions to compare each antisocial trajectory group (life-course persistent and adolescence limited) with the low trajectory group to examine whether antisocial behaviour was related to abnormalities in mean global surface area and mean cortical thickness. Next, we used parcel-wise linear regressions to identify antisocial trajectory group differences in surface area and cortical thickness. All results were controlled for sex and false discovery rate corrected.
Data from 672 participants were analysed, and 80 (12%) were classified as having life-course-persistent antisocial behaviour, 151 (23%) as having adolescence-limited antisocial behaviour, and 441 (66%) as having low antisocial behaviour. Individuals on the life-course-persistent trajectory had a smaller mean surface area (standardised β=-0·18 [95% CI -0·24 to -0·11]; p<0·0001) and lower mean cortical thickness (standardised β=-0·10 [95% CI -0·19 to -0·02]; p=0·020) than did those in the low group. Compared with the low group, the life-course-persistent group had reduced surface area in 282 of 360 anatomically defined parcels and thinner cortex in 11 of 360 parcels encompassing circumscribed frontal and temporal regions associated with executive function, affect regulation, and motivation. Widespread differences in brain surface morphometry were not observed for the adolescence-limited group compared with either non-antisocial behaviour or life-course-persistent groups.
These analyses provide initial evidence that differences in brain surface morphometry are associated with life-course-persistent, but not adolescence-limited, antisocial behaviour. As such, the analyses are consistent with the developmental taxonomy theory of antisocial behaviour and highlight the importance of using prospective longitudinal data to define different patterns of antisocial behaviour development.
US National Institute on Aging, Health Research Council of New Zealand, New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, UK Medical Research Council, Avielle Foundation, and Wellcome Trust.
行为和神经心理学测试研究支持反社会行为的发展分类学理论,该理论将异常的大脑发育确定为生命历程中持续存在的反社会行为的一个基本方面,但尚无研究描述与生命历程中持续存在的反社会行为轨迹和青春期有限的反社会行为轨迹(由前瞻性数据定义)相关的脑结构特征。我们旨在通过检验生命历程中持续存在的反社会行为也与脑结构异常相关这一假设,来确定其是否与神经认知异常有关。
我们使用了来自达尼丁研究参与者45岁时收集的结构MRI数据,该研究是一项具有人口代表性的纵向出生队列研究,研究对象为1972年4月1日至1973年3月31日在新西兰达尼丁出生、居住在该省且3岁时参与首次评估的1037名个体。参与者接受了MRI检查,并为每位参与者提取了平均全脑皮质表面积和皮质厚度。根据7岁至26岁期间信息提供者报告和自我报告的行为问题,参与者此前已被分为表现出生命历程中持续存在的反社会行为、青春期有限的反社会行为或无持续反社会行为史(即低轨迹组)。处理MRI图像的研究人员对反社会行为分组情况不知情。我们使用线性估计的普通最小二乘法回归,将每个反社会行为轨迹组(生命历程中持续存在的和青春期有限的)与低轨迹组进行比较,以检验反社会行为是否与平均全脑表面积和平均皮质厚度异常有关。接下来,我们使用逐块线性回归来确定反社会行为轨迹组在表面积和皮质厚度方面的差异。所有结果均对性别进行了控制,并校正了错误发现率。
对672名参与者的数据进行了分析,其中80人(12%)被归类为具有生命历程中持续存在反社会行为,151人(23%)被归类为具有青春期有限反社会行为,441人(66%)被归类为具有低反社会行为。与低轨迹组相比,生命历程中持续存在反社会行为轨迹的个体平均表面积更小(标准化β=-0.18 [95%置信区间-0.24至-0.11];p<0.0001),平均皮质厚度更低(标准化β=-0.10 [95%置信区间-0.19至-0.02];p=0.020)。与低轨迹组相比,生命历程中持续存在反社会行为组在360个解剖学定义脑区中的282个脑区表面积减小,在360个脑区中的11个脑区皮质变薄,这些脑区包括与执行功能、情感调节和动机相关的特定额叶和颞叶区域。与非反社会行为组或生命历程中持续存在反社会行为组相比,青春期有限反社会行为组未观察到广泛的脑表面形态测量差异。
这些分析提供了初步证据,表明脑表面形态测量差异与生命历程中持续存在的反社会行为有关,但与青春期有限的反社会行为无关。因此,这些分析与反社会行为的发展分类学理论一致,并强调了使用前瞻性纵向数据来定义反社会行为发展不同模式的重要性。
美国国立衰老研究所、新西兰健康研究委员会、新西兰商业、创新和就业部、英国医学研究委员会、阿维耶基金会和惠康信托基金会。