Cavallo Perin P, Pacini G, Giunti S, Comune M, Conte M R, Cassader M, Pagano G
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Eur J Clin Invest. 2000 Jun;30(6):481-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2362.2000.00651.x.
Microvascular angina has been found to be associated with insulin resistance. However, many factors known to affect insulin sensitivity were not excluded in patient selection. We aimed to evaluate whether microvascular angina is per se associated with insulin resistance.
We performed a Frequently Sampled Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test (0.33 g kg(-1) b.w.) in 10 normal weight and normotensive patients with microvascular angina, with normal glucose tolerance and normal plasma lipids. Ten healthy subjects, comparable for age, sex, body mass index, blood pressure and plasma lipids, were used as control group.
Fasting serum glucose (4.49+/-0.2 SEM vs. 4.52+/-0.13 mmol L(-1), P = 0.9), insulin (39.46 +/-3.68 SEM vs. 47.12+/-4.6 pmol L(-1), P = 0.21) and C-peptide (0.56 +/-0.05 SEM vs. 0.53+/-0.05 nmol L(-1), P = 0. 68) values, as well as estimated parameters of insulin secretion and hepatic insulin extraction were similar in the two groups. Insulin sensitivity values (median, range) were also similar in the patients and control subjects (5.76 (3.39-12.30) vs. 7.54 (3.68-13.89. 10(-4) x min(-1)/(microU/mL), P = 0.97).
Microvascular angina per se is not associated with hyperinsulinaemia or insulin resistance when other confounding factors are excluded in patient selection.
已发现微血管性心绞痛与胰岛素抵抗有关。然而,在患者选择过程中并未排除许多已知会影响胰岛素敏感性的因素。我们旨在评估微血管性心绞痛本身是否与胰岛素抵抗相关。
我们对10名体重正常、血压正常、糖耐量正常且血脂正常的微血管性心绞痛患者进行了频繁取样静脉葡萄糖耐量试验(0.33 g/kg体重)。选取10名年龄、性别、体重指数、血压和血脂与之匹配的健康受试者作为对照组。
两组的空腹血清葡萄糖(4.49±0.2 SEM对4.52±0.13 mmol/L,P = 0.9)、胰岛素(39.46±3.68 SEM对47.12±4.6 pmol/L,P = 0.21)和C肽(0.56±0.05 SEM对0.53±0.05 nmol/L,P = 0.68)值,以及胰岛素分泌和肝脏胰岛素提取的估计参数相似。患者和对照组的胰岛素敏感性值(中位数,范围)也相似(5.76(3.39 - 12.30)对7.54(3.68 - 13.89),10⁻⁴×min⁻¹/(μU/mL),P = 0.97)。
当在患者选择中排除其他混杂因素时,微血管性心绞痛本身与高胰岛素血症或胰岛素抵抗无关。