Dicke M
Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 8031, 6700, The, EH Wageningen, Netherlands
Biochem Syst Ecol. 2000 Aug 1;28(7):601-617. doi: 10.1016/s0305-1978(99)00106-4.
Most herbivorous arthropods are specialists that feed on one or a few related plant species. To understand why this is so, both mechanistic and functional studies have been carried out, predominantly restricted to bitrophic aspects. Host-selection behaviour of herbivorous arthropods has been intensively studied and this has provided ample evidence for the role of secondary plant chemicals as source of information in behavioural decisions of herbivores. Many evolutionary studies have regarded co-evolution between plants and herbivores to explain the diversity of secondary plant chemicals and host specialisation of herbivores. However, many cases remain unexplained where herbivores select host plants that are suboptimal in terms of fitness returns. A stimulating paper by Bernays and Graham [(1988) Ecology 69, 886-892)] has initiated a discussion on the need of a multitrophic perspective to understand the evolution of host-plant specialisation by herbivorous arthropods. However, this has hardly resulted in ecological studies on host-selection behaviour that take a multitrophic perspective. Yet, evidence is accumulating that constitutive and induced infochemicals from natural enemies and competitors can affect herbivore behaviour. These cues may constitute important information on fitness prospects, just as plant cues can do. In this paper I selectively review how information from organisms at different trophic levels varies in space and time and how herbivores can integratively exploit this information during host selection. In doing so, research areas are identified that are likely to provide important new insights to explain several of the questions in herbivore host selection that remain unanswered so far. These research areas are at the interface of evolutionary ecology, behavioural ecology and chemical ecology.
大多数食草节肢动物都是专食性的,以一种或几种相关植物物种为食。为了理解为何如此,人们开展了机理和功能研究,主要局限于双营养层面。食草节肢动物的寄主选择行为已得到深入研究,这为次生植物化学物质在食草动物行为决策中作为信息来源的作用提供了充分证据。许多进化研究认为植物和食草动物之间的共同进化可以解释次生植物化学物质的多样性和食草动物的寄主专一性。然而,仍有许多情况无法解释,即食草动物选择的寄主植物在适合度回报方面并非最优。伯奈斯和格雷厄姆发表的一篇具有启发性的论文[(1988年)《生态学》69卷,第886 - 892页]引发了一场关于需要从多营养角度理解食草节肢动物寄主植物专一性进化的讨论。然而,这几乎没有导致从多营养角度对寄主选择行为进行生态学研究。然而,越来越多的证据表明,来自天敌和竞争者的组成型和诱导型信息化合物会影响食草动物的行为。这些线索可能像植物线索一样,构成关于适合度前景的重要信息。在本文中,我有选择地回顾了来自不同营养级生物的信息在空间和时间上是如何变化的,以及食草动物在寄主选择过程中如何综合利用这些信息。在此过程中,确定了一些研究领域,这些领域可能会提供重要的新见解,以解释到目前为止食草动物寄主选择中仍未得到解答的几个问题。这些研究领域处于进化生态学、行为生态学和化学生态学的交叉点。