Gelman S A, Bloom P
Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, 525 E. University Avenue, MI 48109-1109, Ann Arbor, USA.
Cognition. 2000 Aug 14;76(2):91-103. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00071-8.
How do young children extend names for human-made artifacts, such as knife, toy, and painting? We addressed this issue by showing 3-year-olds, 5-year-olds, and adults a series of simple objects and asking them for each, 'What is this?' In one condition, the objects were described as purposefully created; in another, the objects were described as being created by accident. This manipulation had a significant effect on the participants' responses: even 3-year-olds were more likely to provide artifact names (e.g. 'a knife') when they believed the objects were intentionally created and material-based descriptions (e.g. 'plastic') when they believed the objects were accidentally created. This result supports a theory of artifact naming in which intuitions about intention play an important role.
幼儿如何扩展人造物品的名称,比如刀、玩具和画作?我们通过向3岁、5岁儿童以及成年人展示一系列简单物品,并针对每件物品询问他们“这是什么?”来解决这个问题。在一种情况下,物品被描述为有目的地制造;在另一种情况下,物品被描述为偶然制造。这种操作对参与者的回答产生了显著影响:即使是3岁的儿童,当他们认为物品是有意制造时,也更有可能给出物品名称(如“一把刀”),而当他们认为物品是偶然制造时,则更有可能给出基于材料的描述(如“塑料”)。这一结果支持了一种人造物品命名理论,即关于意图的直觉在其中起着重要作用。