• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

集的大小、个体化和对形状的注意。

Set size, individuation, and attention to shape.

机构信息

Indiana University, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, 1101 E Tenth St., Bloomington, IN 47405-7007, United States.

出版信息

Cognition. 2013 Feb;126(2):258-67. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.007. Epub 2012 Nov 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.007
PMID:23167969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3749737/
Abstract

Much research has demonstrated a shape bias in categorizing and naming solid objects. This research has shown that when an entity is conceptualized as an individual object, adults and children attend to the object's shape. Separate research in the domain of numerical cognition suggest that there are distinct processes for quantifying small and large sets of discrete items. This research shows that small set discrimination, comparison, and apprehension is often precise for 1-3 and sometimes 4 items; however, large numerosity representation is imprecise. Results from three experiments suggest a link between the processes for small and large number representation and the shape bias in a forced choice categorization task using naming and non-naming procedures. Experiment 1 showed that adults generalized a newly learned name for an object to new instances of the same shape only when those instances were presented in sets of less than 3 or 4. Experiment 2 showed that preschool children who were monolingual speakers of three different languages were also influenced by set size when categorizing objects in sets. Experiment 3 extended these results and showed the same effect in a non-naming task and when the novel noun was presented in a count-noun syntax frame. The results are discussed in terms of a relation between the precision of object representation and the precision of small and large number representation.

摘要

许多研究表明,在对实体进行分类和命名时存在形状偏见。这些研究表明,当一个实体被概念化为一个单独的物体时,成年人和儿童会关注物体的形状。在数值认知领域的独立研究表明,对小数量和大数量离散项目进行量化有不同的过程。这些研究表明,小数量的区分、比较和理解通常对 1-3 个项目非常准确,有时甚至对 4 个项目也很准确;然而,对大量数量的表示则不够准确。三项实验的结果表明,小数量和大数量表示的过程与在使用命名和非命名程序的强制选择分类任务中的形状偏见之间存在联系。实验 1 表明,只有当新实例的数量少于 3 或 4 个时,成年人才能将新学习的物体名称推广到同一形状的新实例上。实验 2 表明,来自三种不同语言的单语讲者的学前儿童在分类物体时也会受到集合大小的影响。实验 3 扩展了这些结果,并在非命名任务中以及在计数名词句法框架中呈现新名词时显示了相同的效果。这些结果是根据物体表示的精度与小数量和大数量表示的精度之间的关系来讨论的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edaf/3749737/a2dcca769fc9/nihms498075f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edaf/3749737/f7b17849a6b9/nihms498075f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edaf/3749737/84dc032aeca8/nihms498075f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edaf/3749737/947ad18bf720/nihms498075f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edaf/3749737/a2dcca769fc9/nihms498075f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edaf/3749737/f7b17849a6b9/nihms498075f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edaf/3749737/84dc032aeca8/nihms498075f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edaf/3749737/947ad18bf720/nihms498075f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edaf/3749737/a2dcca769fc9/nihms498075f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Set size, individuation, and attention to shape.集的大小、个体化和对形状的注意。
Cognition. 2013 Feb;126(2):258-67. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.007. Epub 2012 Nov 17.
2
Children's attention to rigid and deformable shape in naming and non-naming tasks.儿童在命名和非命名任务中对刚性和可变形形状的关注。
Child Dev. 2000 Nov-Dec;71(6):1555-70. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00248.
3
The absence of a shape bias in children's word learning.儿童词汇学习中形状偏好的缺失。
Dev Psychol. 2005 Nov;41(6):1003-19. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.6.1003.
4
They call it like they see it: spontaneous naming and attention to shape.他们所见即所名:自发命名与对形状的关注。
Dev Sci. 2005 Mar;8(2):182-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00405.x.
5
Individuation of objects and events: a developmental study.物体与事件的个体化:一项发展性研究。
Cognition. 2003 Dec;90(2):163-91. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00143-4.
6
Naming in young children: a dumb attentional mechanism?幼儿命名:一种无声的注意力机制?
Cognition. 1996 Aug;60(2):143-71. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(96)00709-3.
7
What's in a shape? Children represent shape variability differently than adults when naming objects.形状中有什么?儿童在命名物体时对形状变异性的表现与成人不同。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2001 Mar;78(3):213-39. doi: 10.1006/jecp.2000.2573.
8
Object properties and knowledge in early lexical learning.早期词汇学习中的物体属性与知识
Child Dev. 1991 Jun;62(3):499-516.
9
A cross-linguistic examination of the noun-category bias: its existence and specificity in French- and Spanish-speaking preschool-aged children.名词类别偏差的跨语言研究:其在说法语和西班牙语的学龄前儿童中的存在及特殊性
Cogn Psychol. 1997 Apr;32(3):183-218. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1997.0650.
10
The emergence of kind-based object individuation in infancy.婴儿期基于类别的客体个体化的出现。
Cogn Psychol. 2004 Sep;49(2):155-90. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.01.001.

引用本文的文献

1
A MEG Study on the Processing of Time and Quantity: Parietal Overlap but Functional Divergence.一项关于时间和数量加工的脑磁图研究:顶叶重叠但功能分化。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 4;10:139. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00139. eCollection 2019.
2
Words affect visual perception by activating object shape representations.词语通过激活物体形状的表征来影响视觉感知。
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 20;8(1):14156. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32483-2.
3
Universal and uniquely human factors in spontaneous number perception.自发数字感知中的普遍且独特的人类因素。

本文引用的文献

1
The shape-bias in Spanish-speaking children and its relationship to vocabulary.西班牙语儿童的形状偏见及其与词汇量的关系。
J Child Lang. 2012 Mar;39(2):443-55. doi: 10.1017/S030500091100016X. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
2
Correlation versus prediction in children's word learning: Cross-linguistic evidence and simulations.儿童词汇学习中的相关性与预测性:跨语言证据与模拟
Lang Cogn. 2009 Oct 1;1(2):197-217. doi: 10.1515/LANGCOG.2009.010.
3
Spatial attention determines the nature of nonverbal number representation.空间注意力决定了非言语数字表示的性质。
Nat Commun. 2017 Jan 16;8:13968. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13968.
4
Set size and culture influence children's attention to number.集合大小和文化会影响儿童对数字的注意力。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Mar;131:19-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.10.010. Epub 2014 Nov 29.
5
A texture-processing model of the 'visual sense of number'.“数字视觉感”的一种纹理处理模型。
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Sep 7;281(1790). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1137.
6
Neural substrates of numerosity estimation in autism.自闭症中数字估计的神经基础。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Sep;35(9):4362-85. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22480. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Sep;23(9):2336-51. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21581. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
4
The role of comparison in preschoolers' novel object categorization.幼儿在新颖物体分类中的比较作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2010 Nov;107(3):280-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.04.017. Epub 2010 Jun 17.
5
Classifiers as Count Syntax: Individuation and Measurement in the Acquisition of Mandarin Chinese.作为计数句法的分类词:汉语普通话习得中的个体化与度量
Lang Learn Dev. 2008 Oct 1;4(4):249. doi: 10.1080/15475440802333858.
6
Spontaneous analog number representations in 3-year-old children.3 岁儿童自发的模拟数字表示。
Dev Sci. 2010 Mar;13(2):289-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00887.x.
7
The importance of differentiation in young children's acquisition of expertise.差异化在幼儿获取专业技能过程中的重要性。
Cognition. 2009 Aug;112(2):259-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.004. Epub 2009 Jun 13.
8
The development of category learning strategies: what makes the difference?类别学习策略的发展:差异何在?
Cognition. 2009 Jul;112(1):105-19. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.03.012. Epub 2009 May 7.
9
Language, thought, and real nouns.语言、思维与实名词。
Cognition. 2009 Jun;111(3):329-44. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.008. Epub 2009 Apr 5.
10
Of substance: the nature of language effects on entity construal.关于实质:语言对实体建构的影响的本质。
Cogn Psychol. 2009 Jun;58(4):487-524. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.12.001. Epub 2009 Feb 23.