Luzzatti C, Toraldo A, Ghirardi G, Lorenzi L, Guarnaschelli C
Department of Psychology, University of Rome-La Sapienza, Italy.
Brain Cogn. 2000 Jun-Aug;43(1-3):319-24.
Eleven agrammatic and 16 fluent aphasic patients were given a comprehension task consisting of simple, active and passive reversible sentences. The purpose of the study is to reconsider the comprehension disorders in agrammatism, and particularly of passive reversible sentences, to test to what extent Grodzinsky's trace deletion hypothesis (TDH) is generalizable to other types of NP-movement, and finally to ascertain whether the pattern of impairment observed in agrammatism differs from that of fluent aphasic patients. The study confirms that trace analysis may be selectively impaired in agrammatism. However, this deficit is not the only mechanism underlying comprehension disorders and cannot be said to occur in all agrammatic patients. Comprehension disorders also involve the processing of clitic object pronouns which also underly NP-movement. Finally, the impairment found in fluent aphasic patients differs, both in type and severity, from that of agrammatic patients, thus confirming the peculiar aspects of the agrammatic comprehension deficit suggested by Grodzinsky's TDH.
11名语法缺失型失语症患者和16名流畅型失语症患者接受了一项理解任务,该任务由简单的主动和被动可逆句组成。本研究的目的是重新审视语法缺失症中的理解障碍,尤其是被动可逆句的理解障碍,以测试格罗兹尼茨基的痕迹删除假说(TDH)在多大程度上可推广到其他类型的名词短语移位,最后确定在语法缺失症中观察到的损伤模式是否与流畅型失语症患者不同。该研究证实,在语法缺失症中,痕迹分析可能会受到选择性损害。然而,这种缺陷并不是理解障碍的唯一潜在机制,也不能说在所有语法缺失症患者中都会出现。理解障碍还涉及附着宾语代词的处理,而附着宾语代词也是名词短语移位的基础。最后,流畅型失语症患者中发现的损伤在类型和严重程度上都与语法缺失症患者不同,从而证实了格罗兹尼茨基的TDH所提出的语法缺失症理解缺陷的特殊方面。