Caramazza Alfonso, Capasso Rita, Capitani Erminio, Miceli Gabriele
Cognitive Neuropsychology Laboratory, Harvard University, 33 Kirkland St, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Brain Lang. 2005 Jul;94(1):43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.11.006. Epub 2005 Jan 23.
We tested the core prediction of the Trace Deletion Hypothesis (TDH) of agrammatic Broca's aphasia, which contends that such patients' comprehension performance is normal for active reversible sentences but at chance level for passive reversible sentences. We analyzed the comprehension performance of 38 Italian Broca's aphasics with verified damage to Broca's area, who completed sentence-to-picture matching tasks using active and passive reversible sentences as stimuli. The results failed to confirm the predictions made by TDH: only a small minority (15%) performed at chance on passive sentences and better than chance on active sentences. Furthermore, the distribution of the 38 subjects' performance on passive sentences differed from that predicted by the TDH since many more subjects performed at better-than-chance levels than expected. We discuss the implication of these results for claims about the distribution of language processing mechanisms in the brain.
我们对语法缺失型布罗卡失语症的痕迹删除假说(TDH)的核心预测进行了测试,该假说认为,此类患者对主动可逆句的理解表现正常,但对被动可逆句的理解表现则处于随机水平。我们分析了38名经证实布洛卡区受损的意大利布罗卡失语症患者的理解表现,这些患者使用主动和被动可逆句作为刺激完成句子与图片匹配任务。结果未能证实TDH的预测:只有一小部分(15%)患者对被动句的理解表现处于随机水平,而对主动句的理解表现则高于随机水平。此外,38名受试者在被动句上的表现分布与TDH预测的不同,因为表现高于随机水平的受试者比预期的要多得多。我们讨论了这些结果对于大脑中语言处理机制分布的相关主张的意义。