Pons G, Marchand M C, d'Athis P, Sauvage E, Foucard C, Chaumet-Riffaud P, Sautegeau A, Navarro J, Lenoir G
Pharmacologie Périnatale et Pédiatrique, Hôpital Saint-Vincent de Paul, Paris, France.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2000 Jul;30(1):25-31. doi: 10.1002/1099-0496(200007)30:1<25::aid-ppul5>3.0.co;2-c.
The effect of amiloride, a sodium channel blocker, has been evaluated in a multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in cystic fibrosis patients more than 5-years-old (n = 137) whose forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)), and forced mid-expiratory flow (FEF(25-75)) were not below 50%, 50%, and 30% of reference values, respectively. Patients were randomly allocated to two parallel groups. Sixty-four patients were chronically colonized with Pseudomonas aeruginosa; they received either amiloride or placebo as a nebulized solution three times daily for 6 months. Routine treatments were continued. Patients chronically colonized with Pseudomonas received nebulized colimycine twice a day for a month during the third and sixth months of treatment. Bronchopulmonary exacerbations were treated in the usual way. The effects of the amiloride treatment were assessed at the end of the 6-month treatment period. The effects on FVC and secondarily on FEV(1), FEF(25-75), the number of days on antibiotic therapy, the Shwachman score, a nutritional index (weight/height(2)), the change in sputum bacterial flora, and nocturnal cough were assessed. For the patients not chronically colonized with Pseudomonas, the effect of the treatment was also evaluated by counting chronic colonizations with pathogens appearing during the trial period. The present study failed to demonstrate any significant benefit of amiloride over placebo on FVC, FEV(1), and the other secondary endpoints in the studied population. Neither the chronically colonized, nor the noncolonized patients benefited. The confidence intervals of the differences between treatment groups indicated small differences that were most likely of no clinical significance. Complementary analyses taking into account the gender, the type of mutation, the subpopulations whose FVC and FEV(1) were below 80% of normal values at the beginning of the study, and also patients less than 10 years old, did not show any statistically or clinically significant improvements following amiloride therapy.
在一项多中心随机双盲安慰剂对照试验中,对年龄超过5岁(n = 137)、用力肺活量(FVC)、第1秒用力呼气量(FEV₁)和用力呼气中期流速(FEF₂₅₋₇₅)分别不低于参考值50%、50%和30%的囊性纤维化患者,评估了钠通道阻滞剂氨氯吡咪的疗效。患者被随机分配到两个平行组。64例患者长期感染铜绿假单胞菌;他们每天接受3次雾化溶液的氨氯吡咪或安慰剂治疗,为期6个月。常规治疗继续进行。长期感染铜绿假单胞菌的患者在治疗的第3个月和第6个月期间,每天接受2次雾化多粘菌素治疗,为期1个月。支气管肺恶化按常规方法治疗。在6个月治疗期结束时评估氨氯吡咪治疗的效果。评估了对FVC的影响,以及对FEV₁、FEF₂₅₋₇₅、抗生素治疗天数、施瓦克曼评分、营养指数(体重/身高²)、痰液细菌菌群变化和夜间咳嗽的影响。对于未长期感染铜绿假单胞菌的患者,还通过计算试验期间出现的病原体慢性定植情况来评估治疗效果。本研究未能证明在研究人群中,氨氯吡咪在FVC、FEV₁和其他次要终点方面比安慰剂有任何显著益处。长期感染和未感染的患者均未获益。治疗组之间差异的置信区间表明差异很小,很可能无临床意义。考虑到性别、突变类型、研究开始时FVC和FEV₁低于正常值80%的亚组,以及年龄小于10岁的患者的补充分析显示,氨氯吡咪治疗后没有任何统计学或临床显著改善。