Scherrer S S, Kelly J R, Quinn G D, Xu K
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Dent Mater. 1999 Sep;15(5):342-8. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(99)00055-x.
Fractographic analysis of indentation cracks is performed following flexure testing as part of the ASTM (1999) standard for fracture toughness, KIc, determination in advanced ceramics. This method depends on the conduciveness of the material towards fractographic interpretation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of fractography in fracture toughness methods with a feldspathic dental porcelain, in which KIc was measured fractographically as well as numerically using two controlled-flaw beam bending techniques.
The following methods for KIc determination were applied to a dental porcelain containing a leucite volume fraction of 15-20%: (1) surface crack in flexure (SCF) (dependent upon fractographic analysis); and (2) indentation strength (IS) at indentation loads of 9.8 and 19.6 N (applying both standard numeric calculations and fractographic analysis). The testing environments were (1) ambient air (IS and SCF) and (2) flowing dry nitrogen (SCF).
No significant differences were found between numeric and fractographic KIc values for the IS technique at both indentation loads (9.8 and 19.6 N) in ambient air, although KIc values were sensitive to indentation load. Due to the presence of residual stresses, stable crack extension was observed fractographically in all IS specimens, as evidenced by differences between initial (ainitial) and critical (acritical) crack dimensions. For the SCF method, there was a significant difference in toughness between specimens tested in air versus dry nitrogen, however no fractographic evidence for chemically assisted slow crack growth (SCG) was observed.
The SCF method as described by the ASTM standard was applicable to the feldspathic porcelain and produced very comparable results with the numeric toughness calculations of the IS procedure. However, fractographic analysis of the surface crack was somewhat difficult for this glassy ceramic compared with polycrystalline ceramics. Knowledge about stable crack extension or slow crack growth and its fractographic appearance is essential when estimating the toughness from examination of flaw dimensions on fractured surfaces since large calculation errors may occur if these effects are not taken into account.
作为美国材料与试验协会(ASTM,1999年)先进陶瓷断裂韧性K(\text{Ic})测定标准的一部分,在弯曲试验后对压痕裂纹进行断口分析。该方法取决于材料对断口分析的适宜性。本研究的目的是评估断口分析在长石质牙科陶瓷断裂韧性测定方法中的应用,其中K(\text{Ic})通过断口分析以及使用两种控制缺陷梁弯曲技术进行数值测量。
将以下K(_\text{Ic})测定方法应用于白榴石体积分数为15 - 20%的牙科陶瓷:(1)弯曲表面裂纹(SCF)(依赖断口分析);以及(2)在9.8 N和19.6 N压痕载荷下的压痕强度(IS)(应用标准数值计算和断口分析)。测试环境为(1)环境空气(IS和SCF)和(2)流动的干燥氮气(SCF)。
在环境空气中,对于两种压痕载荷(9.8 N和19.6 N)的IS技术,数值计算和断口分析得到的K(\text{Ic})值之间未发现显著差异,尽管K(\text{Ic})值对压痕载荷敏感。由于残余应力的存在,在所有IS试样中通过断口分析观察到稳定的裂纹扩展,初始((a_\text{初始}))和临界((a_\text{临界}))裂纹尺寸之间的差异证明了这一点。对于SCF方法,在空气中与干燥氮气中测试的试样之间韧性存在显著差异,然而未观察到化学辅助慢裂纹扩展(SCG)的断口证据。
ASTM标准所述的SCF方法适用于长石质瓷,并且与IS程序的数值韧性计算结果非常可比。然而,与多晶陶瓷相比,对这种玻璃质陶瓷的表面裂纹进行断口分析有些困难。当通过检查断裂表面上的缺陷尺寸来估计韧性时,了解稳定裂纹扩展或慢裂纹扩展及其断口外观至关重要,因为如果不考虑这些影响可能会出现较大的计算误差。