• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于非医疗目的的全套医疗护理器械

[Instrumentation of full medical care for non-medical purposes].

作者信息

Flügge C

机构信息

Senatsverwaltung für Justiz Berlin, Abteilung Justivollzug Berlin.

出版信息

Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2000 Apr;94(4):265-71; discussion 271-2.

PMID:10863753
Abstract

A survey of European standards and recommendations is given defining the status of prison physicians in the 40 member states of the Council of Europe. Taking into account these standards, the two main tasks of prison physicians in Germany are the following: 1.) Prison physicians have to treat and, if possible, cure patients--just as physicians outside the prisons do. 2.) By expressing their opinion and by taking initiatives, prison physicians have to contribute, to the observance of health standards in connection with the determination of confinement conditions (hygiene, cleanliness, physical exercise, ventilation, nutrition) and to develop them further. They also have to raise the prisoners' awareness of the fact that they should care about their health. These tasks are differentiated from requests that are unduly made to prison physicians by external authorities. Prison physicians are not court experts and the duties which they have to perform as physicians in charge of the treatment of prisoners do not include the rendering of opinions on questions relating to a person's fitness to undergo detention or to stand trial. This task is incumbent on experts, whom the courts have to find and appoint elsewhere than among prison physicians. Decisions regarding the determination of specific confinement conditions in a particular case or the granting of privileges to prisoners have to be taken by the prisons' managerial staff or the administration and not by the prison physicians, who, however, are frequently called in either by prisoners for the purpose of asserting alleged claims or by the prisons' managerial staff for the purpose of rejecting claims which the staff regard as unjustified.

摘要

对欧洲标准和建议进行了一项调查,界定了欧洲理事会40个成员国监狱医生的地位。考虑到这些标准,德国监狱医生的两项主要任务如下:1.)监狱医生必须治疗并尽可能治愈患者——就像监狱外的医生一样。2.)通过发表意见和采取主动行动,监狱医生必须促进在确定监禁条件(卫生、清洁、体育锻炼、通风、营养)方面遵守健康标准,并使其进一步完善。他们还必须提高囚犯对自身健康应予以关注这一事实的认识。这些任务与外部当局对监狱医生提出的不当要求有所不同。监狱医生不是法庭专家,他们作为负责囚犯治疗的医生所必须履行的职责不包括就与一个人的被拘留或受审适宜性相关的问题发表意见。这项任务由专家承担,法庭必须在监狱医生以外的地方寻找并指定专家。关于在特定案件中确定具体监禁条件或给予囚犯特权的决定必须由监狱管理人员或行政部门做出,而不是由监狱医生做出,不过,囚犯经常为了主张所谓的权利而传唤监狱医生,监狱管理人员也经常为了驳回他们认为不合理的权利主张而传唤监狱医生。

相似文献

1
[Instrumentation of full medical care for non-medical purposes].用于非医疗目的的全套医疗护理器械
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2000 Apr;94(4):265-71; discussion 271-2.
2
[The situation of physician in the state prison--constitutional state guarantees of individual rights].[州立监狱中的医生状况——个人权利的宪法保障]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2000 Apr;94(4):258-65.
3
[Medical discretion versus the duty to inform of physicians in prisons--from the view of the prison physicians].[监狱中医生的医疗自主权与告知义务——从监狱医生的视角看]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2000 Apr;94(4):277-81.
4
[Medical discretion versus duty to warn by physicians in prisons-- view of the prison governers].[监狱中医生的医疗自主权与警告义务——监狱管理人员的观点]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2000 Apr;94(4):282-6; discussion 286-7.
5
Appropriate medical care for persons in detention.被拘留者的适当医疗护理。
Med J Malaysia. 2003 Mar;58 Suppl A:119-22.
6
Patients, prisoners, or people? Women prisoners' experiences of primary care in prison: a qualitative study.患者、囚犯,还是人?女性囚犯在监狱中的初级医疗护理体验:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Sep;58(554):630-6. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X330771.
7
Towards equivalent health care of prisoners: European soft law and public health policy in Geneva.迈向囚犯的平等医疗保健:日内瓦的欧洲软法与公共卫生政策
J Public Health Policy. 2008 Jul;29(2):192-206. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2008.6.
8
Prisons' preparedness for pandemic flu and the ethical issues.监狱对流感大流行的防范措施及伦理问题。
Public Health. 2009 Jun;123(6):422-5. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2009.04.003. Epub 2009 May 30.
9
Public health, health promotion and the health of people in prison.公共卫生、健康促进与监狱人员的健康
Community Pract. 2006 Jan;79(1):19-22.
10
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演?美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》:关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.