Belke T W
Department of Psychology, Mount Allison University, Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 May;73(3):319-31. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.73-319.
Six male Wistar rats were exposed to different orders of reinforcement schedules to investigate if estimates from Herrnstein's (1970) single-operant matching law equation would vary systematically with schedule order. Reinforcement schedules were arranged in orders of increasing and decreasing reinforcement rate. Subsequently, all rats were exposed to a single reinforcement schedule within a session to determine within-session changes in responding. For each condition, the operant was lever pressing and the reinforcing consequence was the opportunity to run for 15 s. Estimates of k and R(O) were higher when reinforcement schedules were arranged in order of increasing reinforcement rate. Within a session on a single reinforcement schedule, response rates increased between the beginning and the end of a session. A positive correlation between the difference in parameters between schedule orders and the difference in response rates within a session suggests that the within-session change in response rates may be related to the difference in the asymptotes. These results call into question the validity of parameter estimates from Herrnstein's (1970) equation when reinforcer efficacy changes within a session.
六只雄性Wistar大鼠被暴露于不同顺序的强化程序,以研究根据赫尔斯坦(1970年)的单操作匹配律方程得出的估计值是否会随程序顺序而系统变化。强化程序按强化率递增和递减的顺序安排。随后,所有大鼠在一个实验环节中暴露于单一强化程序,以确定实验环节内反应的变化。对于每种条件,操作行为是压杆,强化结果是有机会奔跑15秒。当强化程序按强化率递增顺序安排时,k和R(O)的估计值更高。在单一强化程序的一个实验环节中,反应率在实验环节开始和结束之间有所增加。程序顺序之间参数差异与实验环节内反应率差异之间的正相关表明,实验环节内反应率的变化可能与渐近线的差异有关。当强化物效能在一个实验环节内发生变化时,这些结果对赫尔斯坦(1970年)方程的参数估计的有效性提出了质疑。