Suppr超能文献

粪便失血定量中的一个潜在错误:简要通信

A potential error in the quantitation of fecal blood loss: concise communication.

作者信息

Chafetz N, Taylor A, Schleif A, Verba J, Hooser C W

出版信息

J Nucl Med. 1976 Dec;17(12):1053-4.

PMID:1086891
Abstract

Chromium-51-labeled red cells were used to quantitate fecal blood loss in a patient with chronic upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. On Day 1, the stool guaiac was positive but the blood loss indicated by 51Cr was less than 1 cm3. Blood loss in the stool by 51Cr did not become significant until Day 3, when it measured 23 cm3. The failure to detect abnormal blood loss on Day 1, and probably on Day 2, appears to be due to a long intestinal transit time from a proximal bleeding site. The problem of slow intestinal transit is not uncommon and could lead to a false-negative study or falsely low estimates of fecal blood loss. This problem could be minimized by beginning stool collection on Day 3 or by delaying stool collection until the appearance in the stool of an oral nonabsorbable marker swallowed when the 51Cr-tagged red cells are injected.

摘要

用铬-51标记的红细胞来定量一名慢性上消化道出血患者的粪便失血量。第1天,粪便愈创木脂试验呈阳性,但铬-51显示的失血量小于1立方厘米。直到第3天,铬-51测定的粪便失血量才显著增加,达到23立方厘米。第1天以及可能第2天未能检测到异常失血量,似乎是由于近端出血部位的肠道传输时间较长。肠道传输缓慢的问题并不罕见,可能导致假阴性研究结果或对粪便失血量的估计过低。通过在第3天开始收集粪便,或在注射铬-51标记的红细胞时吞下口服不可吸收标记物,直到其在粪便中出现后再延迟收集粪便,这个问题可以得到最小化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验