• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

407例患者的腹腔镜下腹壁和切口疝修补术。

Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair in 407 patients.

作者信息

Heniford B T, Park A, Ramshaw B J, Voeller G

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC 28232, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2000 Jun;190(6):645-50. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00280-5.

DOI:10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00280-5
PMID:10872998
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recurrence rates after primary repair of ventral and incisional hernias range from 25% to 52%. Recurrence after open surgery is less likely if mesh is used, but the wide fascial dissection and required flap creation increase complication rates. Laparoscopic techniques offer an alternative.

STUDY DESIGN

To assess the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic ventral and incisional herniorrhaphy, we reviewed the records of all our patients who underwent such a procedure from November 1993 to August 1999. A laparoscopic approach was attempted in all patients considered to require a mesh repair. Patient demographic characteristics, operative details, and outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

Of 415 patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic ventral or incisional herniorrhaphy, conversion to an open procedure was necessary in 8. All the remaining 407 patients (205 men and 202 women; mean age 53.2 years; range 13 to 88 years) were included in the study. Mean fascial defect size was 100.1 cm2 (range 1 to 480 cm2). In 97% of patients, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh was used. Mean operating time was 97 minutes (range 11 to 270 minutes). Mean estimated blood loss was 35 mL (range 10 to 150 mL). Average hospital stay was 1.8 days (range 0 to 17 days). There were 53 complications (13.0%), including cellulitis of a trocar site, infection requiring mesh removal, prolonged suture pain, persistent seroma, intestinal injury, hematoma or postoperative bleeding, prolonged ileus, urinary retention, respiratory distress, fever, intraabdominal abscess, and trocar site herniation. There were no deaths. During a mean followup time of 23 months (range 1 to 60 months), there were 14 hernia recurrences (3.4%), 6 in patients in whom only a stapling device (no sutures) had been used to secure the mesh to the abdominal wall.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic repair was completed in 98.1% of patients in whom it was attempted. The complication rate was acceptable. A short hospital stay and minimal blood loss were documented. The recurrence rate was 3.4%. Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair appear to be safe and effective.

摘要

背景

腹侧疝和切口疝一期修补术后的复发率在25%至52%之间。开放手术中使用补片时复发的可能性较小,但广泛的筋膜剥离和所需的皮瓣制作会增加并发症发生率。腹腔镜技术提供了一种替代方法。

研究设计

为评估腹腔镜腹侧疝和切口疝修补术的安全性和有效性,我们回顾了1993年11月至1999年8月期间所有接受该手术患者的记录。所有被认为需要补片修补的患者均尝试采用腹腔镜方法。记录患者的人口统计学特征、手术细节和结果。

结果

在计划接受腹腔镜腹侧疝或切口疝修补术的415例患者中,8例需要转为开放手术。其余407例患者(205例男性和202例女性;平均年龄53.2岁;范围13至88岁)纳入研究。平均筋膜缺损面积为100.1平方厘米(范围1至480平方厘米)。97%的患者使用了膨化聚四氟乙烯补片。平均手术时间为97分钟(范围11至270分钟)。平均估计失血量为35毫升(范围10至150毫升)。平均住院时间为1.8天(范围0至17天)。共有53例并发症(13.0%),包括套管针部位蜂窝织炎、需要取出补片的感染、缝线疼痛持续时间延长、持续性血清肿、肠损伤、血肿或术后出血、肠梗阻持续时间延长、尿潴留、呼吸窘迫、发热、腹腔内脓肿和套管针部位疝。无死亡病例。在平均23个月(范围1至60个月)的随访期间,有14例疝复发(3.4%),其中6例患者仅使用吻合器(未使用缝线)将补片固定于腹壁。

结论

98.1%尝试进行腹腔镜修补的患者完成了手术。并发症发生率可接受。记录显示住院时间短且失血量极少。复发率为3.4%。腹腔镜腹侧疝和切口疝修补术似乎安全有效。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair in 407 patients.407例患者的腹腔镜下腹壁和切口疝修补术。
J Am Coll Surg. 2000 Jun;190(6):645-50. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00280-5.
2
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a report of 100 consecutive cases.腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术:100例连续病例报告。
Surg Endosc. 2000 May;14(5):419-23. doi: 10.1007/s004640000179.
3
[Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: our experience and review of the literature].[腹腔镜切口疝修补术:我们的经验及文献综述]
Chir Ital. 2007 Sep-Oct;59(5):671-7.
4
Laparoscopic tension-free repair of anterior abdominal wall incisional and ventral hernias with an intraperitoneal Gore-Tex mesh: prospective study and review of the literature.腹腔镜下使用腹膜内戈尔特斯补片对腹壁切口疝和腹疝进行无张力修补:前瞻性研究及文献综述
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2002 Aug;12(4):263-7. doi: 10.1089/109264202760268041.
5
Medium-term follow-up confirms the safety and durability of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with PTFE.中期随访证实了使用聚四氟乙烯进行腹腔镜腹疝修补术的安全性和耐久性。
Surgery. 2003 Oct;134(4):599-603; discussion 603-4. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6060(03)00283-6.
6
Laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernias.腹腔镜下修复大型切口疝。
Am Surg. 2002 Jun;68(6):530-3; discussion 533-4.
7
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with composite mesh: Analysis of risk factors for recurrence in 185 patients with 5 years follow-up.腹腔镜下腹膜前疝修补术复合补片:5 年随访 185 例患者复发的危险因素分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Apr;40:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
8
Interposition of the omentum and/or the peritoneum in the emergency repair of large ventral hernias with polypropylene mesh.网膜和/或腹膜在聚丙烯网片急诊修补大型腹壁疝中的应用。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(6):578-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
9
Comparison of Mesh Fixation Techniques in Elective Laparoscopic Repair of Incisional Hernia-ReliaTack™ v ProTack™ (TACKoMesh) - A double-blind randomised controlled trial.择期腹腔镜切口疝修补术中Mesh固定技术的比较——ReliaTack™与ProTack™(TACKoMesh)——一项双盲随机对照试验。
BMC Surg. 2018 Jul 11;18(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0378-3.
10
Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: our experience with 105 consecutive cases.腹腔镜切口疝修补术:我们连续105例病例的经验。
Chir Ital. 2008 Mar-Apr;60(2):249-55.

引用本文的文献

1
Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) versus intraperitoneal onlay Mesh (IPOM) for ventral hernia repair - an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与腹膜内补片植入修补术(IPOM)治疗腹疝的比较——一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析
Hernia. 2025 Feb 15;29(1):93. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03271-5.
2
Hybrid Technique for Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair: Description and Early Results.腹壁疝修补的杂交技术:描述与早期结果
Cureus. 2024 Jun 22;16(6):e62882. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62882. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Cesena guidelines: WSES consensus statement on laparoscopic-first approach to general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma.
切塞纳指南:WSES 关于普通外科急症和腹部创伤腹腔镜优先方法的共识声明。
World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Dec 8;18(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00520-9.
4
Investigation of the clinical efficacy of thiol-disulfide homeostasis, delta neutrophil index, and ischemia-modified albumin in cases of incarcerated and strangulated hernia.探讨硫醇-二硫键平衡、中性粒细胞 delta 值和缺血修饰白蛋白在嵌顿性和绞窄性疝中的临床疗效。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 Sep;29(9):987-995. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.48313.
5
A Comparative Study on Outcomes and Quality of Life Changes Following Ventral Transabdominal Preperitoneal (Ventral-TAPP) and Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM)-Plus Repair for Ventral Hernia.经腹腹膜前修补术(Ventral-TAPP)与腹腔镜腹腔内补片植入修补术(IPOM)加修补腹疝后结局及生活质量变化的比较研究
Cureus. 2023 Jul 20;15(7):e42222. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42222. eCollection 2023 Jul.
6
Robot-assisted general surgery is safe during the learning curve: a 5-year Australian experience.机器人辅助普通外科手术在学习曲线期间是安全的:澳大利亚 5 年经验。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1541-1546. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01560-8. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
7
A prospective randomized controlled study to compare the efficacy and safety of barbed sutures versus standard fixation techniques using tackers in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair.一项前瞻性随机对照研究,比较倒刺缝线与使用钉合器的标准固定技术在腹腔镜腹侧和切口疝修补术中的疗效和安全性。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2023 Jan;79(1):72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2021.06.019. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
8
Comparison of post-operative outcomes of large direct inguinal hernia repairs based on operative approach (open vs. laparoscopic vs. robotic) using the ACHQC (Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative) database.利用ACHQC(腹部核心健康质量协作组织)数据库,基于手术方式(开放手术、腹腔镜手术与机器人手术)对大型直接腹股沟疝修补术后结果进行比较。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):2923-2931. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09805-7. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
9
Ring closure outcome for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (IPOM plus) in medium and large defects. Long-term follow-up.腹腔镜腹疝修补术(IPOM 附加术)治疗中大型缺损的环闭结果。长期随访。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):2078-2084. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09738-1. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
10
Elective incisional hernia repair: lower risk of postoperative wound infection with laparoscopic versus open repair.择期切口疝修补术:腹腔镜修补与开放修补相比,术后伤口感染风险较低。
Singapore Med J. 2023 Feb;64(2):105-108. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2022005. Epub 2022 Jan 27.