• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经尿道手术中,术前单次口服芦氟沙星与围手术期使用环丙沙星作为预防用药的比较。

Comparison of single preoperative oral rufloxacin versus perioperative ciprofloxacin as prophylactic agents in transurethral surgery.

作者信息

Savoca G, Raber M, Lissiani A, Plaino F, Ciampalini S, Buttazzi L, Belgrano E

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Trieste, Italy.

出版信息

Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2000 Apr;72(1):15-20.

PMID:10875161
Abstract

The aim of this prospective clinical trial was to compare the efficacy of rufloxacin, a once-daily fluoroquinolone administered as a single pre-operative dose versus the perioperative prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin in transurethral surgery. Two hundred and two patients undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumors (132) or transurethral resection of the prostate (70) were selected for the study between January 1997 and June 1998. Patients were randomized to two treatment groups. Group A received a single oral 200 mg dose of rufloxacin three hours before surgery and group B was administered oral ciprofloxacin 250 mg bid until catheter removal. The two treatment groups were homogeneous with respect to patient characteristics. One hundred and seventy-three patients (89 rufloxacin and 84 ciprofloxacin) were assessed and 29 were excluded from the statistical analysis. The incidence of postoperative infection was similar in both treatment groups (5.7% rufloxacin, 4.7% ciprofloxacin). On the other hand, single-dose pre-operative prophylaxis with rufloxacin significantly reduced the cost of antibiotic prophylaxis. Results of the present study show that single dose oral rufloxacin may be used in routine clinical practice as a preoperative prophylactic antibiotic due to its low cost, its documented efficacy and its simple once daily dosage regimen.

摘要

这项前瞻性临床试验的目的是比较芦氟沙星(一种每日一次的氟喹诺酮类药物,术前单次给药)与环丙沙星在经尿道手术中的围手术期预防效果。1997年1月至1998年6月期间,选择了202例接受膀胱肿瘤经尿道切除术(132例)或前列腺经尿道切除术(70例)的患者进行研究。患者被随机分为两个治疗组。A组在手术前3小时口服200mg芦氟沙星单次剂量,B组口服环丙沙星250mg,每日两次,直至拔除导尿管。两个治疗组在患者特征方面具有同质性。对173例患者(89例芦氟沙星组和84例环丙沙星组)进行了评估,29例被排除在统计分析之外。两个治疗组术后感染发生率相似(芦氟沙星组为5.7%,环丙沙星组为4.7%)。另一方面,术前单次剂量使用芦氟沙星预防可显著降低抗生素预防成本。本研究结果表明,由于其成本低、疗效有记录且每日给药方案简单,口服单剂量芦氟沙星可在常规临床实践中用作术前预防性抗生素。

相似文献

1
Comparison of single preoperative oral rufloxacin versus perioperative ciprofloxacin as prophylactic agents in transurethral surgery.经尿道手术中,术前单次口服芦氟沙星与围手术期使用环丙沙星作为预防用药的比较。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2000 Apr;72(1):15-20.
2
Rufloxacin once daily versus ciprofloxacin twice daily in the treatment of patients with acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis.每日一次芦氟沙星与每日两次环丙沙星治疗急性单纯性肾盂肾炎患者的对比研究
J Urol. 1995 Jul;154(1):19-24.
3
The impact of rufloxacin given as prophylaxis to patients with cancer on their oral and faecal microflora.给癌症患者预防性使用鲁氟沙星对其口腔和粪便微生物群的影响。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 Nov;38(5):839-47. doi: 10.1093/jac/38.5.839.
4
Rufloxacin once daily versus ofloxacin twice daily for treatment of complicated cystitis and upper urinary tract infections. Italian Multicentre UTI Rufloxacin Group.每日一次芦氟沙星与每日两次氧氟沙星治疗复杂性膀胱炎和上尿路感染。意大利多中心泌尿道感染芦氟沙星研究组
Infection. 1993 Mar-Apr;21(2):106-11. doi: 10.1007/BF01710743.
5
Prophylaxis in transurethral surgery: oral lomefloxacin versus intravenous cefuroxime.
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 1993 Jan-Feb;15(1):57-9.
6
Impact of rufloxacin and ciprofloxacin on the intestinal microflora in a germ-free mice model.
Chemotherapy. 1995 Jul-Aug;41(4):281-8. doi: 10.1159/000239357.
7
Single-dose oral ciprofloxacin compared with cefotaxime and placebo for prophylaxis during transurethral surgery.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999 Mar;43 Suppl A:77-84.
8
[Efficacy of ciprofloxacine antibiotic prophylaxis of infectious complications after TUR of the prostate].[环丙沙星预防前列腺电切术后感染性并发症的疗效]
Urologiia. 2005 Sep-Oct(5):21-5.
9
Lomefloxacin versus ciprofloxacin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections: a multicenter study.洛美沙星与环丙沙星治疗复杂性尿路感染的多中心研究
J Chemother. 1996 Jun;8(3):210-3. doi: 10.1179/joc.1996.8.3.210.
10
Antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate.接受经尿道前列腺切除术患者的抗生素预防
Urology. 1996 Jun;47(6):852-6. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00066-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Fosfomycin trometamol vs ciprofloxacin for antibiotic prophylaxis before transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy: A meta-analysis of clinical studies.磷霉素氨丁三醇与环丙沙星用于经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检前的抗生素预防:临床研究的荟萃分析
Arab J Urol. 2019 Apr 11;17(2):114-119. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2019.1592636. eCollection 2019.
2
Comparison of guideline recommendations for antimicrobial prophylaxis in urologic procedures: variability, lack of consensus, and contradictions.泌尿外科手术中抗菌药物预防应用指南推荐的比较:变异性、缺乏共识及矛盾之处
Int Urol Nephrol. 2018 Nov;50(11):1923-1937. doi: 10.1007/s11255-018-1971-1. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
3
The real practice of antibiotic prophylaxis for prostate biopsy in Korea where the prevalence of quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli is high.
在韩国,喹诺酮耐药性大肠杆菌流行率较高的情况下,前列腺活检抗生素预防的实际应用情况。
Korean J Urol. 2014 Sep;55(9):593-8. doi: 10.4111/kju.2014.55.9.593. Epub 2014 Sep 5.