Cannestra A F, Bookheimer S Y, Pouratian N, O'Farrell A, Sicotte N, Martin N A, Becker D, Rubino G, Toga A W
Laboratory of Neuro Imaging, Division of Brain Mapping, Division of Neurosurgery, UCLA School of Medicine, 710 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, California, 90024-1769, USA.
Neuroimage. 2000 Jul;12(1):41-54. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0597.
We used intraoperative optical imaging of intrinsic signals (iOIS) and electrocortical stimulation mapping (ESM) to compare functionally active brain regions in 10 awake patients undergoing neurosurgical resection. Patients performed two to four tasks, including visual and auditory naming, word discrimination, and/or orofacial movements. All iOIS maps included areas identified by ESM mapping. However, iOIS also revealed topographical specificity dependent on language task. In Broca's area, naming paradigms activated both anterior and posterior inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), while the word discrimination paradigm activated only posterior IFG. In Wernicke's area, object naming produced activations localizing over the inferior and anterior/posterior regions, while the word discrimination task activated superior and anterior cortices. These results may suggest more posterior phonological activation and more anterior semantic activations in Broca's area, and more anterior/superior phonological activation and more posterior/inferior semantic activations in Wernicke's area. Although similar response onset was observed in Broca's and Wernicke's areas, temporal differences were revealed during block paradigm (20-s) activations. In Broca's area, block paradigms yielded a boxcar temporal activation profile (in all tasks) that resembled response profiles observed in motor cortex (with orofacial movements). In contrast, activations in Wernicke's area responded with a more dynamic profile (including early and late peaks) which varied with paradigm performance. Wernicke's area profiles were very similar to response profiles observed in sensory and visual cortex. The differing temporal patterns may therefore reflect unique processing performed by receptive (Wernicke's) and productive (Broca's) language centers. This study is consistent with task-specific semantic and phonologic regions within Broca's and Wernicke's areas and also is the first report of response profile differences dependent on cortical region and language task.
我们使用术中固有信号光学成像(iOIS)和皮层电刺激图谱(ESM)来比较10名接受神经外科切除术的清醒患者的功能活跃脑区。患者执行两到四项任务,包括视觉和听觉命名、单词辨别和/或口面部运动。所有iOIS图谱都包含由ESM图谱确定的区域。然而,iOIS还揭示了取决于语言任务的地形特异性。在布罗卡区,命名范式激活了额下回(IFG)的前部和后部,而单词辨别范式仅激活了IFG后部。在韦尼克区,物体命名在颞下回以及前/后区域产生激活,而单词辨别任务激活了颞上回和颞叶前部皮质。这些结果可能表明布罗卡区存在更多的后部语音激活和更多的前部语义激活,而韦尼克区存在更多的前部/上部语音激活和更多的后部/下部语义激活。尽管在布罗卡区和韦尼克区观察到了相似的反应起始,但在组块范式(20秒)激活期间发现了时间差异。在布罗卡区,组块范式产生了一种类似火车车厢的时间激活模式(在所有任务中),类似于在运动皮层(伴随口面部运动)观察到的反应模式。相比之下,韦尼克区的激活呈现出更动态的模式(包括早期和晚期峰值),且随范式表现而变化。韦尼克区的模式与在感觉和视觉皮层观察到的反应模式非常相似。因此,不同的时间模式可能反映了感受性(韦尼克区)和产出性(布罗卡区)语言中枢所执行的独特处理过程。本研究与布罗卡区和韦尼克区内特定任务的语义和语音区域一致,也是关于取决于皮质区域和语言任务的反应模式差异的首次报告。