• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Relaparoscopy for the detection and treatment of complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

作者信息

Dexter S P, Miller G V, Davides D, Martin I G, Sue Ling H M, Sagar P M, Larvin M, McMahon M J

机构信息

Leeds Institute for Minimally Invasive Therapy, Centre for Digestive Diseases, and the University of Leeds, Wellcome Wing, The General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2000 Apr;179(4):316-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00345-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00345-7
PMID:10875993
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparotomy remains the commonest intervention in patients with abdominal complications of laparoscopic surgery. Our own policy is to employ relaparoscopy to avoid diagnostic delay and unnecessary laparotomy. The results of using this policy in patients with suspected intra-abdominal complications following laparoscopic cholecystectomy are reviewed.

METHODS

Data were collected from laparoscopic cholecystectomies carried out by five consultant surgeons in one center. Details of relaparoscopy for complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients underwent relaparoscopy within 7 days of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for intra-abdominal bleeding (2 patients) or abdominal pain (11 patients). The causes of pain were subhepatic haematoma (1), acute pancreatitis (1), small bowel injury (1), and minor bile leakage (6). In 2 patients no cause was identified. Twelve patients were managed laparoscopically and 1 patient required laparotomy. Median stay after relaparoscopy was 7 days (range 2 to 19).

CONCLUSIONS

Exploratory laparotomy can be avoided by prompt relaparoscopy in the majority of patients with abdominal complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

摘要

相似文献

1
Relaparoscopy for the detection and treatment of complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Am J Surg. 2000 Apr;179(4):316-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00345-7.
2
Relaparoscopy in minor bile leakage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an alternative approach?腹腔镜胆囊切除术后轻微胆漏的再次腹腔镜检查:一种替代方法?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Aug;21(4):288-91. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31822a2373.
3
Role of relaparoscopy in the management of minor bile leakage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.再次腹腔镜检查在腹腔镜胆囊切除术后轻微胆漏处理中的作用
Br J Surg. 2000 Feb;87(2):176-80. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01323.x.
4
[Relaparoscopy as an alternative to laparotomy for laparoscopic complications].[经腹腹腔镜检查作为腹腔镜并发症剖腹手术的替代方法]
Chirurg. 2006 Nov;77(11):986-97. doi: 10.1007/s00104-006-1252-x.
5
A single-centre experience of relaparoscopy in complications of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair-feasibility and outcomes.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术并发症再次腹腔镜手术的单中心经验——可行性与结果
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2308-14. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4387-3. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
6
The role of relaparoscopy in the management of bile leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.再次腹腔镜检查在腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆漏处理中的作用。
Int Surg. 1995 Oct-Dec;80(4):356-7.
7
Effects of previous abdominal surgery incision type on complications and conversion rate in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.既往腹部手术切口类型对腹腔镜胆囊切除术并发症及中转率的影响。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009 Oct;19(5):373-8. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181b92935.
8
"Relaparoscopic" management of surgical complications: The experience of an Emergency Center.手术并发症的“再腹腔镜”处理:一家急救中心的经验
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):2804-10. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4558-2. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
9
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in The Netherlands: early national results].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1992 May 16;136(20):974-7.
10
[Analysis of complications and clinical and pathologic factors in relation to the laparoscopic cholecystectomy].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术相关并发症及临床病理因素分析]
Rozhl Chir. 2014 Mar;93(3):123-31.

引用本文的文献

1
The Association of Polish Surgeons (APS) clinical guidelines for the use of laparoscopy in the management of abdominal emergencies. Part II.波兰外科医生协会(APS)关于腹腔镜在腹部急症处理中应用的临床指南。第二部分。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023 Sep;18(3):379-400. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2023.127884. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
2
Relaparoscopy in the management of post-operative complications after minimally invasive gastrectomy for gastric cancer.腹腔镜在胃癌微创术后并发症处理中的应用。
Updates Surg. 2023 Feb;75(2):429-434. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01328-z. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
3
Laparoscopy in Emergency: Why Not? Advantages of Laparoscopy in Major Emergency: A Review.
急诊腹腔镜检查:为何不采用?重大急诊中腹腔镜检查的优势:一项综述。
Life (Basel). 2021 Sep 3;11(9):917. doi: 10.3390/life11090917.
4
IS LAPAROSCOPIC REOPERATION FEASIBLE TO TREAT EARLY COMPLICATIONS AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC COLORECTAL RESECTIONS?腹腔镜再次手术治疗腹腔镜结直肠切除术后早期并发症是否可行?
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2020 Jul 8;33(1):e1502. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020190001e1502.
5
"Relaparoscopic" management of surgical complications: The experience of an Emergency Center.手术并发症的“再腹腔镜”处理:一家急救中心的经验
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):2804-10. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4558-2. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
6
Relaparoscopy for management of postoperative complications following colorectal surgery: ten years experience in a single center.结直肠手术后并发症处理的再次腹腔镜检查:单中心十年经验
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jul;29(7):1795-803. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3862-6. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
7
Laparoscopic surgery complications: postoperative peritonitis.腹腔镜手术并发症:术后腹膜炎。
J Med Life. 2012 Sep 15;5(3):288-96. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
8
Reoperation following minimally invasive surgery: are the "rules" different?微创手术后的再次手术:“规则”是否不同?
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2006 Nov;19(4):217-22. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-956443.
9
Entirely laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma: lymph node yield and resection margins.完全腹腔镜下腺癌根治性胃切除术:淋巴结清扫数量及切缘情况
Surg Endosc. 2009 Jan;23(1):153-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0072-0. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
10
Reoperation of biliary tract by laparoscopy: experiences with 39 cases.腹腔镜胆道再次手术:39例经验
World J Gastroenterol. 2008 May 21;14(19):3081-4. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.3081.