• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非麻醉科护士对术后硬膜外镇痛的认知与态度

The knowledge and attitudes of nonanesthesia nurses regarding postoperative epidural analgesia.

作者信息

Sandie C L, Heindel L J

机构信息

Naval Medical Center, San Diego, Calif., USA.

出版信息

AANA J. 1999 Oct;67(5):455-60.

PMID:10876436
Abstract

The provision of epidural analgesia for postoperative pain control offers many patient benefits and has become commonplace on many nursing units. Since nurses are responsible for the day-to-day management of patients receiving epidural analgesia, their knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding this technique are pivotal to its success. Therefore, the purpose of the present descriptive study was to examine the knowledge base, attitudes, and clinical practice of registered nurses (N = 85) regarding postoperative epidural analgesia as managed by an acute pain service (APS). Information was obtained from a survey distributed via a convenience sample to all nurses working on 6 units in a large military teaching facility. We developed the "Epidural Knowledge and Attitude Survey" using the nursing literature on epidural analgesia. The survey consisted of a demographics section, true/false (T/F) questions, multiple choice (M/C) questions, an attitude section, and a comment section. These sections addressed the nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practices in regard to epidural pharmacology, management, and adverse effects, as well as their general satisfaction with the APS of their facility. Data were analyzed statistically using means, standard deviations, percentages, forward step-wise linear regression, the Fisher-Irwin (exact) test, the chi 2 test, and analysis of variance with Bonferroni multiple comparisons. A P value of < .05 was considered statistically significant. Results of the study demonstrated that the respondents attained a 78% overall correct score on T/F questions and 38% on M/C questions. The attitude section illustrated that 73% of nurses had "positive" attitudes toward epidural analgesia. Correct management of patients receiving epidural analgesia was being practiced by 77% of nurses. The satisfaction with the APS at this facility was 32% "very satisfied" and 62% "somewhat satisfied." The demographic characteristics that best predicted a higher score on the knowledge portion of the survey were greater years of practice as a nurse and receipt of pain education in nursing training. Nurses who had received inservice education about epidural analgesia rated a "good" self-knowledge of epidurals more often (40%) than those who did not (10%) and scored significantly higher on the knowledge portion of the survey.

摘要

提供硬膜外镇痛以控制术后疼痛对患者有诸多益处,并且在许多护理单元已成为常规操作。由于护士负责接受硬膜外镇痛患者的日常管理,他们对该技术的知识、态度和实践对其成功至关重要。因此,本描述性研究的目的是调查注册护士(N = 85)在急性疼痛服务(APS)管理下对术后硬膜外镇痛的知识基础、态度和临床实践。信息通过便利抽样向一家大型军事教学机构6个科室的所有护士发放的调查问卷获取。我们依据关于硬膜外镇痛的护理文献编制了“硬膜外知识与态度调查问卷”。该问卷包括人口统计学部分、正误(T/F)问题、多项选择(M/C)问题、态度部分和评论部分。这些部分涉及护士在硬膜外药理学、管理和不良反应方面的知识、态度和实践,以及他们对所在机构APS的总体满意度。数据采用均值、标准差、百分比、向前逐步线性回归、Fisher-Irwin(精确)检验、卡方检验以及带有Bonferroni多重比较的方差分析进行统计学分析。P值 <.05被视为具有统计学意义。研究结果表明,受访者在正误问题上的总体正确得分率为78%,在多项选择问题上为38%。态度部分显示,73%的护士对硬膜外镇痛持“积极”态度。77%的护士对接受硬膜外镇痛的患者进行了正确管理。对该机构APS的满意度为32%“非常满意”和62%“有些满意”。在调查问卷知识部分得分较高的最佳预测人口统计学特征是护士工作年限更长以及在护理培训中接受过疼痛教育。接受过硬膜外镇痛在职教育的护士比未接受过的护士更常(40%)认为自己对硬膜外知识“掌握良好”,并且在调查问卷的知识部分得分显著更高。

相似文献

1
The knowledge and attitudes of nonanesthesia nurses regarding postoperative epidural analgesia.非麻醉科护士对术后硬膜外镇痛的认知与态度
AANA J. 1999 Oct;67(5):455-60.
2
Knowledge and attitudes about cancer pain management: a national survey of Italian oncology nurses.关于癌症疼痛管理的知识与态度:一项针对意大利肿瘤护理人员的全国性调查。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2007 Jul;11(3):272-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2006.09.003. Epub 2006 Nov 16.
3
Factors influencing nurses' participation in clinical research.影响护士参与临床研究的因素。
Gastroenterol Nurs. 2008 May-Jun;31(3):198-208. doi: 10.1097/01.SGA.0000324112.63532.a2.
4
Pain Management Practices in a Pediatric Emergency Room (PAMPER) Study: interventions with nurses.儿科急诊室疼痛管理实践(PAMPER)研究:护士干预措施
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009 Aug;25(8):498-503. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181b0a0af.
5
The attitudes of casualty nurses in Taiwan to patients who have attempted suicide.台湾急诊护士对自杀未遂患者的态度。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Feb;16(2):255-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01479.x.
6
Effects of a pain education program on nurses' pain knowledge, attitudes and pain assessment practices in China.疼痛教育项目对中国护士疼痛知识、态度及疼痛评估实践的影响。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008 Dec;36(6):616-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.12.020. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
7
Knowledge and attitudes of Turkish oncology nurses about cancer pain management.土耳其肿瘤护理人员对癌症疼痛管理的知识与态度。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2008 Mar;9(1):17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2007.09.002.
8
Nurses' knowledge and skills in colonoscopy patients' pain management.护士在结肠镜检查患者疼痛管理方面的知识与技能。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jun;16(6):1125-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01668.x.
9
Previous BFHI training and nurses' knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding exclusive breastfeeding.以往的爱婴医院倡议培训以及护士关于纯母乳喂养的知识、态度和做法。
Afr J Med Med Sci. 2002 Jun;31(2):137-40.
10
The effect of a VIPS implementation programme on nurses' knowledge and attitudes towards documentation.虚拟交互式病人模拟器(VIPS)实施计划对护士关于病历记录的知识和态度的影响。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2004 Sep;18(3):325-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2004.00289.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Training programmes for healthcare professionals in managing epidural analgesia: A scoping review.医疗保健专业人员硬膜外镇痛管理培训方案:一项范围综述
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Apr;69(4):e70025. doi: 10.1111/aas.70025.
2
Satisfaction as a Mediator and Its Interaction With Adherence to Labor Analgesia Protocols: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Chinese Medical Personnel.满意度作为中介变量及其与遵守分娩镇痛协议的交互作用:中国医务人员的横断面调查。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 28;10:899515. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.899515. eCollection 2022.