Kapala J, Copes D, Sproston A, Patel J, Jang D, Petrich A, Mahony J, Biers K, Chernesky M
Gamma-Dynacare Medical Laboratories, Brampton, Ontario, Canada.
J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Jul;38(7):2480-3. doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.7.2480-2483.2000.
Specimen pooling to achieve efficiency when testing urine specimens for Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acids has been suggested. We pooled endocervical swabs from 1,288 women and also tested individual swabs by ligase chain reaction (LCR). Out of 53 positive specimens, pools of 4 or 8 specimens missed two positives, providing 96.2% accuracy compared to individual test results. Dilution and positive-control spiking experiments showed that negative specimens with inhibitors of LCR in the pool reduced the signal. Conversely, two extra positives, detected only through pooling, were negative by individual testing but became positive after storage, suggesting that fresh positive specimens with labile inhibitors may be positive in a pool because of dilution of inhibitors. For this population of women with a 4% prevalence of C. trachomatis infection, substantial savings in cost of reagents (55 to 63%) and technologist time (50 to 63%) made pooling strategies a desirable alternative to individual testing.
有人建议在检测沙眼衣原体核酸的尿液样本时采用样本合并以提高效率。我们将1288名女性的宫颈拭子进行合并,并通过连接酶链反应(LCR)对单个拭子进行检测。在53份阳性样本中,4份或8份样本的合并检测遗漏了两份阳性样本,与单个检测结果相比,准确率为96.2%。稀释和阳性对照加样实验表明,合并样本中含有LCR抑制剂的阴性样本会降低信号。相反,仅通过合并检测发现的另外两份阳性样本,单个检测时为阴性,但储存后变为阳性,这表明含有不稳定抑制剂的新鲜阳性样本在合并样本中可能因抑制剂稀释而呈阳性。对于沙眼衣原体感染率为4%的这一女性群体,试剂成本(55%至63%)和技术人员时间(50%至63%)的大幅节省使得合并策略成为个体检测的理想替代方案。