Stary A, Schuh E, Kerschbaumer M, Götz B, Lee H
Outpatients' Centre for Diagnosis of Infectious Venero-Dermatological Diseases, Vienna, Austria.
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Sep;36(9):2666-70. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.9.2666-2670.1998.
Based on the amplification of chlamydia-specific rRNA sequences and the ligase chain reaction (LCR), the performance characteristics of the Gen-Probe Chlamydia trachomatis transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) assay were evaluated with endocervical, urine, and vulval specimens from women and urethral and urine specimens from men and were compared with those for cultures on endocervical, vulval, and urethral swabs. Of the 308 women and 240 men tested, 25 (8.1%) and 44 (18.3%), respectively, were shown to be infected. By using the infected individual as the expanded "gold standard" for calculations, the TMA assay and LCR gave similar performances for the sensitivity of male urethral (93.2%) and urine (88.6 and 86.4%) samples, while culture detected only half of the 44 infected men. In women, the sensitivities of the TMA assay for endocervical and vulval samples were 88 and 92%, respectively, compared to values of 92% for the LCR on both sample types and of 52 and 8%, respectively, for culture. By using first-void urine for chlamydial diagnosis in women, LCR detected 24 (96%) and TMA assay detected 19 (76%) infected individuals, showing a significantly lower sensitivity for urine in women (P = 0.0253). The results indicate a high overall agreement for both amplifying techniques for all examined specimen types, except for female urine. Furthermore, they confirm the previous observation that vulval swabs are an effective alternative noninvasive sample type for the detection of C. trachomatis infection in women by nucleic acid-based amplification technologies.
基于衣原体特异性rRNA序列的扩增和连接酶链反应(LCR),采用来自女性的宫颈、尿液和外阴标本以及来自男性的尿道和尿液标本,对Gen-Probe沙眼衣原体转录介导扩增(TMA)检测方法的性能特征进行了评估,并与宫颈、外阴和尿道拭子培养结果进行了比较。在接受检测的308名女性和240名男性中,分别有25名(8.1%)和44名(18.3%)被证实感染。以感染个体作为扩大的“金标准”进行计算,TMA检测和LCR在男性尿道(93.2%)和尿液(88.6%和86.4%)样本的敏感性方面表现相似,而培养仅检测出44名感染男性中的一半。在女性中,TMA检测对宫颈和外阴样本的敏感性分别为88%和92%,而LCR对这两种样本类型的敏感性均为92%,培养的敏感性分别为52%和8%。对于女性衣原体诊断采用首次晨尿,LCR检测出24名(96%)感染个体,TMA检测出19名(76%)感染个体,表明女性尿液检测的敏感性显著较低(P = 0.0253)。结果表明,除女性尿液外,对于所有检测的标本类型,两种扩增技术的总体一致性较高。此外,它们证实了之前的观察结果,即外阴拭子是通过基于核酸的扩增技术检测女性沙眼衣原体感染的一种有效的非侵入性替代样本类型。