Fischer B, Gezeck S, Hartnegg K
Brain Research Group, Institute of Biophysics, University of Freiburg, Hansastrasse 9, D-79104, Freiburg, Germany.
Vision Res. 2000;40(16):2211-7. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00082-1.
In an antisaccade task, where saccades in the direction opposite of a suddenly presented stimulus are required, certain numbers of prosaccades can occur. The hypothesis is put forward that poor fixation and poor voluntary saccade control constitute two independent sources for the errors. This possibility is investigated by including the corrections of the errors in the analysis. First, the eye movements of 346 normal subjects (group N) performing a gap antisaccade and an overlap prosaccade task were measured. For each subject the proportion of express saccades in the overlap prosaccade task and the proportion of prosaccades in the gap antisaccade task were determined. The data of 150 subjects with more than 20% proerrors were divided into two groups: group A with relatively many, group B with relatively few express saccades in the overlap prosaccade task. Group A subjects produced their errors after significantly shorter reaction times and they corrected their errors significantly faster and more often than group B subjects. Second, we analysed the data of three groups of subjects: the complete normal group N, a group D of dyslexic subjects (n=343), and a group T containing all subjects irrespective of their cognitive achievements (n=780). A highly significant negative correlation exists between the correction rates and the error rates. A factor analysis of the variables performed for each group separately results in only two factors, one describing prosaccade the other antisaccade control. Only the error rate contributes significantly to both factors indicating that high errors may have two independent reasons.
在一项反扫视任务中,要求做出与突然呈现的刺激方向相反的扫视,此时可能会出现一定数量的顺向扫视。有人提出假说,认为注视不佳和自主扫视控制不佳是导致错误的两个独立原因。通过在分析中纳入错误校正来研究这种可能性。首先,测量了346名正常受试者(N组)在间隙反扫视和重叠顺向扫视任务中的眼动。对于每个受试者,确定其在重叠顺向扫视任务中快速扫视的比例以及在间隙反扫视任务中顺向扫视的比例。将150名顺向错误率超过20%的受试者的数据分为两组:A组在重叠顺向扫视任务中快速扫视相对较多,B组相对较少。A组受试者产生错误后的反应时间明显更短,且他们校正错误的速度明显更快、频率更高。其次,我们分析了三组受试者的数据:完整的正常N组、343名阅读障碍受试者的D组以及包含所有受试者(无论其认知成绩如何)的T组(n = 780)。校正率与错误率之间存在高度显著的负相关。对每组变量分别进行因子分析,结果仅得到两个因子,一个描述顺向扫视,另一个描述反扫视控制。只有错误率对两个因子都有显著贡献,这表明高错误率可能有两个独立的原因。