Dahl R, Henriksen J M
Scand J Respir Dis. 1979 Apr;60(2):51-5.
In this double blind study, 10 patients with bronchial asthma underwent exercise challenge on five occasions. The first of these was a control test carried out without prior drug administration; the other tests were preceded by the administration, in random order, of a sodium cromoglycate (SCG) capsule, a placebo capsule, an ampoule of sodium cromoglycate solution, and a placebo ampoule. Comparisons of the largest falls in PEFR after exercise showed statistically significant inhibition of exercise-induced bronchospasm, compared with control, with both SCG inhalation solution (P less than 0.01) and SCG powder (P less than 0.01). SCG powder was more active, but the difference was not significant. A significant difference in protection was found between SCG powder and its placebo (P less than 0.01). SCG inhalation solution was also more effective than its placebo, but the difference did not reach significance, since the latter conferred some protection.
在这项双盲研究中,10名支气管哮喘患者进行了5次运动激发试验。第一次是在未预先给药的情况下进行的对照试验;其他试验则随机给予色甘酸钠(SCG)胶囊、安慰剂胶囊、一支色甘酸钠溶液和一支安慰剂溶液。运动后最大呼气流量(PEFR)下降幅度的比较显示,与对照相比,色甘酸钠吸入溶液(P<0.01)和色甘酸钠粉末(P<0.01)均能显著抑制运动诱发的支气管痉挛。色甘酸钠粉末的作用更强,但差异不显著。色甘酸钠粉末与其安慰剂之间在保护作用上存在显著差异(P<0.01)。色甘酸钠吸入溶液也比其安慰剂更有效,但差异未达到显著水平,因为后者也有一定的保护作用。